Paredes v. First American Financial Corporation
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
This proposed class action against First American Financial Corporation was filed in federal court but limited docket information is currently available. Based on the defendant's core business in residential real estate title insurance and closing services, the case likely alleges conduct affecting ordinary homebuyers, sellers, or property owners, though the specific claims cannot be determined from the information provided.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Robinhood Order Flow Settlement
Robinhood is settling claims that it routed customer market orders to sell equities at prices lower than the National Best Bid and market orders to buy equities at prices higher than the National Best Offer during market hours between September 1, 2016 and September 1, 2018, allegedly resulting in worse execution prices for customers. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability, fault, or wrongdoing.
Up to $17.60
Surplus Proceeds Settlement
When Michigan counties foreclosed on properties for unpaid taxes from 2013 through 2020, they sold the properties at auction and kept the difference between the taxes owed and the sale proceeds. The lawsuit alleges the counties violated property owners' rights by retaining these "surplus proceeds" without compensating the former owners.
125 percent of each property's surplus proceeds, minus attorneys' fees and costs, subject to certain potential adjustments
Clackamas County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Clackamas County allegedly violated property owners' rights by failing to provide proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes and costs, or by retaining foreclosed properties worth more than the tax debt without compensation. The county denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid costly litigation and address the risks from the Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision.
LA Financial Data Breach Settlement
LA Financial Federal Credit Union experienced a data breach on or about June 10, 2024, that compromised the personally identifiable information (PII) of settlement class members. The compromised data may have included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, account numbers, and other sensitive information. The defendant has agreed to a $725,000 settlement to resolve claims related to this breach.
$50–$5,100