Clackamas County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
What happened
Clackamas County allegedly violated property owners' rights by failing to provide proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes and costs, or by retaining foreclosed properties worth more than the tax debt without compensation. The county denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid costly litigation and address the risks from the Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who held or is the heir or successor to a person or entity that held an ownership interest in or valid lien on real property that was foreclosed on and sold or retained by Clackamas County for non-payment of real property taxes, where the redemption period lapsed between October 12, 2017 and January 12, 2024.
How to file
Submit a completed Claim Form online or by mail postmarked no later than July 24, 2026. You may file your claim at this settlement website or mail it to the Claims Administrator at the address provided. Supporting documentation is required to establish your claim as a class member or heir.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Robinhood Order Flow Settlement
Robinhood is settling claims that it routed customer market orders to sell equities at prices lower than the National Best Bid and market orders to buy equities at prices higher than the National Best Offer during market hours between September 1, 2016 and September 1, 2018, allegedly resulting in worse execution prices for customers. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability, fault, or wrongdoing.
Up to $17.60
Surplus Proceeds Settlement
When Michigan counties foreclosed on properties for unpaid taxes from 2013 through 2020, they sold the properties at auction and kept the difference between the taxes owed and the sale proceeds. The lawsuit alleges the counties violated property owners' rights by retaining these "surplus proceeds" without compensating the former owners.
125 percent of each property's surplus proceeds, minus attorneys' fees and costs, subject to certain potential adjustments
LA Financial Data Breach Settlement
LA Financial Federal Credit Union experienced a data breach on or about June 10, 2024, that compromised the personally identifiable information (PII) of settlement class members. The compromised data may have included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, account numbers, and other sensitive information. The defendant has agreed to a $725,000 settlement to resolve claims related to this breach.
$50–$5,100
Munoz v. PHH Corp. Mortgage Insurance Settlement
PHH Corp. and affiliated companies allegedly violated laws prohibiting kickbacks in connection with mortgage settlement services by collecting private mortgage insurance that was included in PHH's captive mortgage reinsurance agreements. PHH has denied any wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle rather than continue litigation.
Up to $875