Automotive class action settlements

FCA US LLC Automotive Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against automaker FCA US LLC. The case is categorized under contract law, which suggests the allegations may involve vehicle sales, warranties, or consumer agreements. The specific claims are not detailed in the provided docket text and should be treated as allegations, not proven facts.

General Motors Automotive Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against General Motors LLC in federal court. The complaint appears to involve contract-related claims concerning GM vehicles, based on the nature of suit listed as Contract: Other. The allegations are not yet proven, and this is a newly filed case, not a settlement.

BMW of North America Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG. The nature of suit is 'Personal Property: Other,' which often involves claims about defective products or damage to personal property, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text. The plaintiff demands a jury trial.

Irvine Auto Retail Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Irvine Auto Retail I, Inc., apparently concerning alleged practices in its auto retail business. The docket entries and nature of suit are unavailable, so the specific allegations cannot be determined from the provided metadata.

M & N Dealerships XII Consumer Class Action

A newly filed proposed class action against M & N Dealerships XII LLC. Based only on the caption and limited docket information, the lawsuit appears to involve claims related to the dealership's conduct, but the specific allegations are not described in the available text. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Cambridge Honda Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Cambridge Motor Car Company, LLC, which does business as Cambridge Honda. The lawsuit appears to involve claims on behalf of consumers related to the dealership's sales or business practices. The exact nature of the allegations is not described in the available docket text.

Shah v. Mazda Motor of America Class Action

A proposed class action lawsuit was filed against Mazda Motor of America, Inc. in the Northern District of California. Without access to the complaint details, the nature and specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, though the case appears to involve consumer claims typical of automotive litigation.

Boyle v. FCA US Class Action

A proposed class action against FCA US, LLC, apparently concerning fraud related to vehicles or automotive products. The complaint was filed by numerous individual plaintiffs and entities, but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entry alone.

Lahijani v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC

A proposed class action has been filed against Mercedes-Benz USA LLC in the Central District of California. Without access to the complaint, the specific allegations cannot be determined, but given the automotive defendant and consumer plaintiff, the case likely involves a vehicle defect, warranty issue, or related consumer claim affecting ordinary car owners.

Lankford v. Yorozu Automotive Tennessee Class Action

A proposed class action against automotive supplier Yorozu Automotive Tennessee, Inc. concerning an unspecified contract dispute. The case was removed from Tennessee state court and is being consolidated with two related overlapping cases, with plaintiffs preparing to file a consolidated class action complaint.

Rubin v. JEA Management Services D/B/A Covered Auto

A proposed class action filed by Jacob Rubin against JEA Management Services, operating as Covered Auto, apparently concerning automotive-related services or products. The specific allegations are not disclosed in the available docket metadata, but the case caption and defendant's apparent business model suggest claims potentially affecting ordinary vehicle owners or consumers seeking auto-related services.

Mason v. American Honda Motor Co. Class Action

A proposed class action against American Honda Motor Co., Inc. alleging fraud. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in California and references a related case, suggesting potential coordination or overlapping claims involving the automotive manufacturer and its consumers.

Mercedes-Benz USA Approved Emission Modification Incentive Settlement

Mercedes-Benz settled with a coalition of state attorneys general regarding the design, manufacture, import, marketing, offer, sale, or lease of certain diesel vehicles. As part of the settlement, Mercedes-Benz is offering eligible owners and lessees $2,000 to incentivize installation of an Approved Emission Modification.

Paid Up to $2,000

BMW Shark Fin Antenna Sealing Defect Settlement

BMW manufactured certain 2019-2020 BMW X3, X4, X5, X6, and X7 vehicles with a shark-fin antenna that had sealing defects. The settlement requires BMW to reimburse owners and lessees for past repair costs related to this defect and extend the New Vehicle Limited Warranty coverage for the sealing defect.

Paid Reimbursement for eligible past Sealing-Defect Repair expenses and extension of New Vehicle Limited Warranty

Soleil and Hammonds v. Hartford Insurance Company UIM Settlement

Hartford collected premiums for underinsured motorist (UIM) automobile insurance coverage that was allegedly illusory, misleading, or inadequate. The defendants improperly applied offsets from UIM claims for amounts already paid by liable parties in automobile accidents.

Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel EGR Cooler Settlement

FCA US sold Model Year 2014-2019 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel Trucks with defective Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) coolers that crack due to thermal fatigue, causing coolant leaks that can lead to combustion in the intake manifold and vehicle fires. FCA US denies liability but has agreed to settle to avoid litigation.

Hazdovac Emissions Warranty Settlement

Mercedes-Benz USA allegedly failed to properly classify fourteen vehicle parts as high-cost emissions warranty parts that should be covered under California's High-Priced Part (HPP) Warranty for 7 years and 70,000 miles. Mercedes-Benz denies wrongdoing and admits no liability.

Polson v. Maximum Booting Company Vehicle Immobilization Settlement

Maximum Booting Company is involved in a certified class action lawsuit related to vehicle immobilization (booting). The company allegedly engaged in practices related to booting vehicles.

Crutcher v. Liberty Mutual Insurance UIM Settlement

Liberty Mutual and Safeco allegedly reduced or "offset" underinsured motorist (UIM) claims by the amount paid by at-fault drivers in accidents between October 2010 and March 2022. The company is settling the class action by paying $6.5 million to affected policyholders and providing partial premium refunds to those who purchased UM/UIM coverage during the class period.

Paid Underinsured motorist claimants receive cash payment; UM/UIM policy holders receive partial premium refund

Smith v. AAA Interinsurance Exchange UIM Settlement

AAA (Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club) reduced or "offset" underinsured motorist (UIM) insurance claims by the amount insureds received from the at-fault driver's insurer, and sold UM/UIM coverage during the class period. The settlement provides refunds and payments to affected policyholders.

Paid Up to $25,000

Chrysler 200 MultiAir Actuator and Fuel Injector Settlement

FCA US LLC allegedly failed to provide appropriate warranty coverage for MultiAir Actuator and Fuel Injector components as emissions-related parts under California Emissions Warranty requirements for 2015-2017 Chrysler 200 vehicles. FCA US is settling the lawsuit without admitting wrongdoing.

Paid Reimbursement for past qualifying MultiAir Actuator or Fuel Injector repairs, plus automatic warranty extension on these components

Turbocharger Class Settlement - Kimball v. Volkswagen Group of America

Volkswagen and Audi vehicles allegedly had defective turbochargers prone to premature failure due to wastegate issues. Volkswagen denies the claims and maintains the turbochargers are not defective and function properly, but agreed to settle the case.

Paid For past repairs: 40-50% of paid invoice expense (up to $3,850 for non-dealer repairs). For Generation 3 vehicles: warranty extension covering 50% of repair/replacement costs for turbocharger failures due to wastegate issues.

GM Fuel Pump Settlement

General Motors equipped certain 2011-2016 Duramax diesel Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra trucks with a CP4 fuel pump that allegedly failed prematurely. Owners and former owners paid for repairs or experienced losses when they sold their trucks. GM has agreed to settle by paying cash compensation to affected class members and providing reimbursement for future repairs.

Paid Cash payment for CP4 fuel pump repairs paid out of pocket; cash payment for former owners who no longer own their trucks; 50% reimbursement for future CP4 fuel pump repairs performed on or after May 6, 2025

Mazda Valve Stem Seal Settlement

Certain 2021-2022 Mazda vehicles equipped with 2.5L turbocharged engines allegedly contained defective valve stem seals that caused excessive oil consumption. The defect was caused by damage to the valve stem seals on the exhaust side of the engine. Mazda denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and provide relief to class members.

Subaru EyeSight Settlement

Subaru vehicles' EyeSight systems—which include Pre-Collision Braking, Rear Automatic Braking, and Lane Keep Assist features—allegedly had defects or deficiencies. Subaru denies the allegations and maintains the systems function properly and were properly designed and manufactured. The parties settled without the court deciding in favor of either side.

Paid 75% of the cost of a Covered Repair for current owners/lessees; 75% reimbursement of past out-of-pocket repair expenses for former owners/lessees

Hampton v. General Motors LLC - Oklahoma GM Engine Litigation

General Motors sold 2011-2014 Chevrolet and GMC vehicles equipped with LC9 5.3 Liter V8 engines that allegedly contain a defective piston assembly causing excessive engine wear, oil consumption, spark plug fouling, rough idling, and potential engine damage. GM denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the case.

Paid Pro rata share of $24,833,000 settlement

Ardoin v. GoAuto Insurance Company Total Loss Settlement

GoAuto Insurance Company allegedly breached its auto insurance policies by failing to pay state sales tax, registration and tag fees, title fees, and/or regulatory fees as part of the actual cash value when determining that vehicles were total losses.

Volkswagen Atlas Seat Latch Settlement

Volkswagen is accused of defects in the second row seat latching mechanism in 2018-2024 Atlas vehicles. Volkswagen denies all claims but agreed to settle. The settlement provides a warranty extension covering repairs and reimbursement for past out-of-pocket expenses for repairs to the second row seat latching mechanism.

Paid Up to $1,700

Mazda Connect Infotainment Settlement

Mazda Connect Infotainment systems in certain Mazda vehicle models allegedly experienced technical glitches including reboots, freezing, non-responsiveness, bootloop processes, and audio/video errors. Mazda denies these allegations and denies the system is defective. The parties have agreed to settle the litigation without trial or court decision on the merits.

Paid Reimbursement for software updates and repair/replacement expenses for infotainment system components; automatic 24-month limited warranty extension

GM Ignition Switch Economic Settlement (Canada)

General Motors vehicles were subject to 2014 recalls involving the Delta ignition system, key rotation, Camaro knee-key, and electric power steering. Settlement class representatives claim consumers overpaid when they bought or leased these vehicles. GM denies the allegations but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs and risks.

Paid Payment amounts will vary depending on which recalls apply to vehicles, administrative expenses, number and type of eligible vehicles for which claims are filed, and number of eligible class members who file claims

Hino Emissions Class Action Settlement

Hino Motors allegedly misrepresented emission levels in certain Hino trucks, with emissions exceeding regulatory limits. The defendants deny the claims but have agreed to settle the lawsuit.

Paid $1,500–$15,000

HandsFreeLink Class Action Settlement

Plaintiffs claim that American Honda Motor Co., Inc. failed to disclose a defect in the HandsFreeLink hands-free calling system offered in certain Acura vehicles (2004-2008 TL, 2005-2008 MDX, and 2007-2009 RDX models). Plaintiffs allege this defect caused them out-of-pocket losses and other damages. Honda denies all allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.

Subaru Battery Drain Settlement

Subaru vehicles (model years 2015–2020 Outback, Forester, Legacy, WRX, and 2019–2020 Ascent) allegedly suffered from a design defect causing battery drain. The lawsuit claims Subaru violated consumer statutes and breached warranties. Subaru denies the claims and maintains the vehicles were properly designed and warranted.

Paid Cash reimbursement for pre-Notice battery replacements, related testing/diagnosis, towing services, and reasonable costs from being stranded, plus extended warranty coverage for qualifying battery failures after Notice

Porsche Gasoline Emissions Settlement

Porsche and Volkswagen allegedly sold or leased certain gasoline-powered Porsche vehicles in the United States that produced excess emissions and/or obtained worse fuel economy on the road than in testing conditions. The defendants deny the claims but agreed to settle.

Paid $200–$1,350

Ford F-Series Door Latch Class Action Settlement

Ford F-Series trucks (2015-2019 model years) allegedly have door latches with a design defect that causes them to malfunction. Ford denies all allegations of wrongdoing but has agreed to settle and provide compensation for out-of-pocket repair, towing, and rental expenses related to door latch issues.

Paid $10–$400

Apple iPhone Device Performance Litigation Settlement

In 2016, Apple announced certain iPhones had a battery problem causing unexplained shutdowns. Plaintiffs allege Apple knew about the defect but failed to disclose it properly. Instead, Apple released an iOS update that reduced functionality and battery life, allegedly pushing customers to purchase new iPhones.