Consumer products class action settlements
Class action settlements over defective, mislabeled, or falsely advertised consumer products.
Consumer product settlements by the numbers
A settlement fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not what any one claimant receives — most funds are divided among everyone who files. Settlements are negotiated agreements, and defendants typically deny wrongdoing rather than being found liable.
The 39 settlements in this category that publish a fund, grouped by size. Most cluster low and a few are very large — which is why the headline figure above is a median rather than an average.
| Fund size | Settlements | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | 5 | 13% | |
| $1M – $5M | 13 | 33% | |
| $5M – $25M | 12 | 31% | |
| $25M – $100M | 8 | 21% | |
| $100M and up | 1 | 3% |
A fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not an individual payout.
Get new claim opportunities by email
Free alerts for new settlements and deadlines. Unsubscribe anytime.
Accepting claims now
Holsapple v. Reactor Inc. (Vertical Hold) Settlement
Vertical Hold Rock Climbing Gym allegedly excluded male and non-binary customers from paying for women's and ladies' clinics, classes, or events between 2017 and 2020. The defendants agreed to settle this class action lawsuit by providing compensation to eligible class members.
Four day passes to Vertical Hold
Calverton Park Vehicle Towing Settlement
The City of Calverton Park towed vehicles from private property and charged owners fines and fees, including special tax bills, alleging violations of a municipal nuisance ordinance. The defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability.
The amount of your payment will depend on whether you were able to recover your vehicle from the tow lot; the number of days your vehicle was impounded before release; and the total costs of fines and fees, including the Special Tax Bill, you paid to the City of Calverton Park or the tow lot.
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Gelasio v. Educative Subscription Auto-Renewal Settlement
Educative automatically renewed customers' annual and monthly digital subscription offerings and charged their payment methods without providing the required disclosures and authorizations under California law. Educative denies these claims, and the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further expense and litigation risk.
$11.93–$23.86
Consumer products cases in litigation
Filed and being fought in court. These are allegations — there is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet.
Diaz v. Mush Foods, Inc. ADA Accessibility Class Action
A proposed class action under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleges that Mush Foods, Inc. has violated disability access requirements. The complaint includes exhibits related to medical certification and website error reports, suggesting the allegations may concern accessibility barriers in digital or physical consumer-facing operations.
Tindale v. Apple American Group Class Action
A putative class action has been filed against Apple American Group LLC and Apple American Group II LLC under a contract-based theory. The docket entries indicate a class action complaint with jury demand, but the specific allegations and nature of the contractual dispute are not detailed in the available filing information.
Lema v. Apple American Group Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Apple American Group LLC in federal court in Ohio. The complaint alleges unspecified claims under the broad category of "Other" personal injury matters, with a jury demand. The specific allegations and legal theories are not disclosed in the available docket entries.
Battle v. Empava Appliances Inc. Disability Access Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that Empava Appliances Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act or related disability access laws. The specific nature of the alleged violations is not detailed in the docket entries provided, but the case involves claims regarding civil rights and disability access related to the defendant's appliances or services.
Benavides Moran v. Scandinavian Designs Disability Access Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Scandinavian Designs, Inc. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, apparently concerning alleged failures to provide equal access or accommodations to individuals with disabilities. The specific nature of the alleged accessibility violations is not detailed in the docket entry, but the case was recently filed in federal court in the Southern District of New York.
Parker v. Williams-Sonoma Disability Access Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Williams-Sonoma's website or services fail to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, apparently creating barriers to access for customers with disabilities. The complaint references a medical certification and website error report as supporting documentation.
Boyle v. FCA US Class Action
A proposed class action against FCA US, LLC, apparently concerning fraud related to vehicles or automotive products. The complaint was filed by numerous individual plaintiffs and entities, but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entry alone.
Mayo v. Utz Quality Foods Class Action
A proposed class action against Utz Quality Foods, LLC and Utz Brands, Inc. alleging fraud or violations of truth-in-lending laws. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York and names Michael Mayo as the plaintiff.
Oura, Inc. Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Oura, Inc. in federal court in Northern California. The specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, but based on Oura's business (health and fitness tracking devices and related services), the case may concern product defects, data privacy, advertising claims, or related consumer issues.
Benavides Moran v. Morinaga America ADA Class Action
A proposed class action filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleging that Morinaga America, Inc. failed to provide adequate accessibility or accommodations to individuals with disabilities. The specific nature of the alleged violation is not yet clear from the docket entry, but the case appears to concern disability access claims that could affect multiple consumers.
Benavides Moran v. Munchkin, Inc. – Disability Access Class Action
A proposed class action against Munchkin, Inc. under the Americans with Disabilities Act and related civil rights statutes, apparently concerning alleged failure to provide adequate accessibility or accommodations related to the defendant's products or services. The nature of suit designation suggests claims that ordinary consumers with disabilities were denied equal access or faced discrimination.
W. L. Gore & Associates Product Liability Class Action
This proposed class action alleges personal injury arising from a W. L. Gore & Associates product. The complaint appears to involve a defective or harmful product that allegedly caused injury to consumers or users of the defendant's goods.
Closed to new claims
Past the filing deadline — kept so you can look up what a case was about and what it paid.
LVGP 2023 Ticket Settlement
Defendants delayed the FP2 Free Practice Session scheduled for November 16, 2023, and subsequently revoked class members' admission without cause before the session began. Class members alleged they were entitled to partial refunds of their ticket price for the 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix. Defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing and admit no liability.
National Association of Realtors MLS Commission Settlement
The National Association of Realtors and major real estate companies are settling claims that they engaged in anticompetitive practices related to MLS commissions and home sales. The defendants have agreed to pay $28.5 million in settlements, though they admit no wrongdoing.
SpotHero Drip Pricing Settlement
SpotHero, Inc. allegedly violated California law by not displaying the full price, including its service fee, to reserve parking spots on its website and mobile application until near the end of the checkout process, which Plaintiff alleges constitutes unlawful drip pricing. Defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing.
Paid Each Settlement Class Member's Settlement Benefit depends on the average of the service fees paid by that member.
Generac Solar Power Systems SnapRS Settlement
Generac PWRcell solar power systems contain SnapRS devices that allegedly may overheat, melt, or fail, causing shutdowns and performance issues. Generac denies these allegations and any wrongdoing. The defendants have agreed to settle to avoid the risk, cost, and time of continued litigation.
New York Renaissance Faire Ticket Fee Settlement
Renaissance Entertainment Productions, Inc. allegedly failed to properly disclose service fees for tickets to its New York Renaissance Faire in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendant denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continuing the case.
Paid Up to $20
Chiechi v. Albany Park Settlement
Albany Park deceptively advertised discounts for products on its website AlbanyPark.com, including misrepresenting the discount amounts. The lawsuit claims violations of California consumer protection laws including the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law, and Unfair Competition Law, as well as common law fraud and unjust enrichment claims. Albany Park denies all liability and wrongdoing.
Paid Up to $115
Mattress Pricing Settlement
This is a class action settlement involving Resident Home, LLC regarding mattress pricing practices. Settlement Class Members who file a valid Claim Form will receive a Voucher and release claims against the defendant and other Released Parties.
Regina Molloy v. Resident Home, LLC Settlement
Resident Home, LLC is the defendant in a class action lawsuit. The settlement provides compensation in the form of vouchers to class members.
Paid Voucher
Beer v. Fandango Media Settlement
Fandango Media allegedly failed to timely disclose a mandatory Convenience Fee for online movie ticket purchases through Fandango to California theaters between June 2020 and June 2024, and violated laws by offering FanClub memberships with $10 monthly credits or promo codes that expire after 30 days to California and Washington consumers. Fandango denies wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.
Paid $3.25–$10.75
Bestway Spa Pump Class Action Settlement
Customers claimed that certain Bestway Spa Pumps sold between May 2021 and May 2024 were defective and were subject to a recall conducted in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Bestway denies it did anything wrong. The parties reached a proposed settlement to resolve the lawsuit on a class action basis.
Paid Up to $75
Splish Splash Ticket Fee Settlement
Festival Fun Parks, LLC d/b/a Palace Entertainment allegedly failed to properly disclose a processing fee for electronic tickets to its Splish Splash waterpark prior to those tickets being selected for purchase, in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.07(4). The defendant denies violating any law but has agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.
Paid Pro rata share of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of fees you paid
Carter v. Green Skyline Apartments Habitability Settlement
The plaintiffs alleged that Green Skyline Apartments failed to maintain habitable conditions in the lobby, elevators, hallways, stairwells, and common areas of their building at 753 James Street in Syracuse. The defendant has neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the cost and inconvenience of litigation.
Paid Individual allocated amount determined by number of months lived in building, with a cap in the Settlement Agreement. Each qualifying month equals one point; total points determine each member's share of the Net Settlement Fund.
Grubhub Delivery Fee Settlement
Grubhub made false or misleading representations regarding delivery fees, service fees, and menu prices on its delivery orders. Grubhub denies these allegations and denies any wrongdoing.
Paid Up to $10
Cohen v. eSupplements Magnesium Supplement Settlement
Nutricost sold Magnesium Glycinate Supplements marketed as containing 420 mg of magnesium "as magnesium glycinate" when they allegedly did not contain the advertised amount. Nutricost denies any wrongdoing and denies violating any state or federal law.
Paid Individual payment amounts will depend on the total number of valid and timely claims filed by all Settlement Class Members
Shimano Crankset Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.
Paid Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)
Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement
Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
Paid $25–$150
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries - Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries and related companies sold mattresses containing fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering the foam. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the mattress cover or be released if the cover is removed, causing potential economic harm, property damage, or physical effects. The defendants deny all allegations and wrongdoing, and are settling for purposes of judicial efficiency.
Paid Voucher good for use on single purchase at Ashley Furniture retailers; pro rata share based on total valid claims from $9 million Common Voucher Fund, plus potential pro rata cash payment if attorneys' fees and costs awarded are less than $3 million
Tuft & Needle Deceptive Discount Advertising Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products sold on its website. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims.
Paid Up to $75
Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement
Menard Inc., Disston Company, and Gino Development allegedly failed to provide adequate disclosures regarding the date contained on Menard-branded PERFORMAX or MASTERFORCE bonded abrasive wheels. The defendants deny no wrongdoing is not explicitly stated on the page.
Rahil Doctor v. Posh Group, Inc. - Ticket Fee Settlement
Posh Group, Inc. allegedly charged California residents fees that were not included in the advertised ticket price when they purchased event tickets. Posh denies all wrongdoing and asserts that the settlement is not an admission of guilt or liability.
Team Group DRAM Settlement
Team Group is accused of misleading consumers about the advertised speeds of its DDR-3, DDR-4, and DDR-5 DRAM memory products, allegedly implying that the advertised speeds were "out of the box" speeds requiring no PC adjustments. Team Group denies the allegations and admits no wrongdoing. The parties agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continued litigation.
Paid Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund
Tom's of Maine Toothpaste Settlement
Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive allegedly engaged in deceptive and misleading business practices with respect to the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of certain Tom's toothpaste products made at their Sanford, Maine facility. The defendants deny wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and risks.
Beef Antitrust Settlement
Several beef processors including JBS, Cargill, National Beef, and Tyson Foods allegedly conspired to limit the supply of beef and increase prices. They allegedly entered into a market allocation agreement and stopped competing against each other, with the purpose and effect of increasing their profit margins and the price consumers paid for beef. Tyson Foods and Cargill have settled for a combined $87.5 million.
Anova Culinary Song Beverly Act Settlement
Anova is accused of violating the California Song Beverly Act by requiring consumers to provide certain personally identifiable information when making credit card purchases on Anova's website or mobile app. Anova has agreed to pay $500,000 to settle these allegations without admitting wrongdoing.
Paid Pro Rata Cash Payment to all participating members from settlement fund after deductions for administration costs, service award, and attorney fees