Consumer products class action settlements

FCA US LLC Automotive Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against automaker FCA US LLC. The case is categorized under contract law, which suggests the allegations may involve vehicle sales, warranties, or consumer agreements. The specific claims are not detailed in the provided docket text and should be treated as allegations, not proven facts.

Church & Dwight Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Church & Dwight Co., Inc., apparently concerning claims under fraud or truth-in-lending laws. The docket indicates Janet Ross filed a complaint, but it does not provide details about the specific alleged conduct. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Upbound Group Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Upbound Group Inc in federal court. The docket text indicates a class-action complaint but provides no factual details beyond a 'P.I.: Other' nature-of-suit code, so the specific allegations are unclear. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Whirlpool Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Whirlpool Corporation. The publicly available docket text does not describe the specific claims, but the caption and defendant suggest allegations involving consumer appliances or other consumer products. These are only allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

DVF Studio Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against DVF Studio, LLC. Based on the limited docket information, the alleged claims appear to concern the company's consumer practices, though the exact nature of the allegations is not specified. The allegations are unproven and no settlement has been reached.

Fragrance Lord Consumer Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against Fragrance Lord LLC, a company whose name suggests it sells fragrances. The available docket caption and nature-of-suit information do not specify the allegations, so the exact claims are unclear. The case may concern the defendant's consumer fragrance products or related business practices.

Marc Fisher Consumer Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Marc Fisher, LLC. The nature of suit and initial docket entry are unavailable, so the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone, but it appears to involve consumer claims. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not a settlement.

Dexcom Medical Device Class Action

A proposed class action against Dexcom, Inc. was filed in federal court. The docket indicates a personal injury case involving medical devices, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available caption. The claims appear to concern harm potentially affecting ordinary users of Dexcom products.

General Motors Automotive Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against General Motors LLC in federal court. The complaint appears to involve contract-related claims concerning GM vehicles, based on the nature of suit listed as Contract: Other. The allegations are not yet proven, and this is a newly filed case, not a settlement.

GHD North America Class Action

This is a newly filed proposed class action against GHD North America LLC. The available docket metadata does not describe the specific allegations or nature of suit, so the underlying claims cannot be determined from the caption alone.

Jacques Marie Mage Consumer Class Action

This is a newly filed proposed class action against Jacques Marie Mage, Inc. The available docket metadata does not describe the specific allegations, but the defendant appears to be a luxury eyewear company, suggesting the case may involve consumer claims such as product defects, false advertising, or similar issues. These are allegations only and not proven facts.

Wiley X Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Wiley X Inc., apparently concerning allegations about its consumer products. The exact claims are not specified in the available docket metadata, but the case was filed as a putative class action.

Calverton Park Vehicle Towing Settlement

The City of Calverton Park towed vehicles from private property and charged owners fines and fees, including special tax bills, alleging violations of a municipal nuisance ordinance. The defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability.

Paid The amount of your payment will depend on whether you were able to recover your vehicle from the tow lot; the number of days your vehicle was impounded before release; and the total costs of fines and fees, including the Special Tax Bill, you paid to the City of Calverton Park or the tow lot.

Holsapple v. Reactor Inc. (Vertical Hold) Settlement

Vertical Hold Rock Climbing Gym allegedly excluded male and non-binary customers from paying for women's and ladies' clinics, classes, or events between 2017 and 2020. The defendants agreed to settle this class action lawsuit by providing compensation to eligible class members.

Paid Four day passes to Vertical Hold

LVGP 2023 Ticket Settlement

Defendants delayed the FP2 Free Practice Session scheduled for November 16, 2023, and subsequently revoked class members' admission without cause before the session began. Class members alleged they were entitled to partial refunds of their ticket price for the 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix. Defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing and admit no liability.

National Association of Realtors MLS Commission Settlement

The National Association of Realtors and major real estate companies are settling claims that they engaged in anticompetitive practices related to MLS commissions and home sales. The defendants have agreed to pay $28.5 million in settlements, though they admit no wrongdoing.

SpotHero Drip Pricing Settlement

SpotHero, Inc. allegedly violated California law by not displaying the full price, including its service fee, to reserve parking spots on its website and mobile application until near the end of the checkout process, which Plaintiff alleges constitutes unlawful drip pricing. Defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing.

Paid Each Settlement Class Member's Settlement Benefit depends on the average of the service fees paid by that member.

Generac Solar Power Systems SnapRS Settlement

Generac PWRcell solar power systems contain SnapRS devices that allegedly may overheat, melt, or fail, causing shutdowns and performance issues. Generac denies these allegations and any wrongdoing. The defendants have agreed to settle to avoid the risk, cost, and time of continued litigation.

New York Renaissance Faire Ticket Fee Settlement

Renaissance Entertainment Productions, Inc. allegedly failed to properly disclose service fees for tickets to its New York Renaissance Faire in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendant denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continuing the case.

Paid Up to $20

Chiechi v. Albany Park Settlement

Albany Park deceptively advertised discounts for products on its website AlbanyPark.com, including misrepresenting the discount amounts. The lawsuit claims violations of California consumer protection laws including the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law, and Unfair Competition Law, as well as common law fraud and unjust enrichment claims. Albany Park denies all liability and wrongdoing.

Paid Up to $115

Mattress Pricing Settlement

This is a class action settlement involving Resident Home, LLC regarding mattress pricing practices. Settlement Class Members who file a valid Claim Form will receive a Voucher and release claims against the defendant and other Released Parties.

Regina Molloy v. Resident Home, LLC Settlement

Resident Home, LLC is the defendant in a class action lawsuit. The settlement provides compensation in the form of vouchers to class members.

Paid Voucher

Beer v. Fandango Media Settlement

Fandango Media allegedly failed to timely disclose a mandatory Convenience Fee for online movie ticket purchases through Fandango to California theaters between June 2020 and June 2024, and violated laws by offering FanClub memberships with $10 monthly credits or promo codes that expire after 30 days to California and Washington consumers. Fandango denies wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.

Paid $3.25–$10.75

Bestway Spa Pump Class Action Settlement

Customers claimed that certain Bestway Spa Pumps sold between May 2021 and May 2024 were defective and were subject to a recall conducted in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Bestway denies it did anything wrong. The parties reached a proposed settlement to resolve the lawsuit on a class action basis.

Paid Up to $75

Splish Splash Ticket Fee Settlement

Festival Fun Parks, LLC d/b/a Palace Entertainment allegedly failed to properly disclose a processing fee for electronic tickets to its Splish Splash waterpark prior to those tickets being selected for purchase, in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law § 25.07(4). The defendant denies violating any law but has agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.

Paid Pro rata share of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of fees you paid

Carter v. Green Skyline Apartments Habitability Settlement

The plaintiffs alleged that Green Skyline Apartments failed to maintain habitable conditions in the lobby, elevators, hallways, stairwells, and common areas of their building at 753 James Street in Syracuse. The defendant has neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the cost and inconvenience of litigation.

Paid Individual allocated amount determined by number of months lived in building, with a cap in the Settlement Agreement. Each qualifying month equals one point; total points determine each member's share of the Net Settlement Fund.

Grubhub Delivery Fee Settlement

Grubhub made false or misleading representations regarding delivery fees, service fees, and menu prices on its delivery orders. Grubhub denies these allegations and denies any wrongdoing.

Paid Up to $10

Magnesium Supplement Settlement

Nutricost sold Magnesium Glycinate Supplements marketed as containing 420 mg of magnesium "as magnesium glycinate" when they allegedly did not contain that amount or form. Nutricost denies any wrongdoing and denies violating any state or federal law.

Paid Individual payment amounts will depend on the total number of valid and timely claims filed by all Settlement Class Members.

Shimano Crankset Settlement

Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to a crash hazard. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and sought relief in connection with the advertising and marketing of the defendants' products and the alleged inadequacy of the voluntary recall. The defendants deny any wrongdoing and no physical injuries were alleged.

Paid Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing a replacement crankset and installing it on your bicycle (if replacement occurred before September 21, 2023, and Express Warranty had expired)

Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement

Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.

Paid $25–$150

Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries - Mattress Fiberglass Settlement

Ashley Furniture Industries and related companies sold mattresses containing fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering the foam. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the mattress cover or be released if the cover is removed, causing potential economic harm, property damage, or physical effects. The defendants deny all allegations and wrongdoing, and are settling for purposes of judicial efficiency.

Paid Voucher good for use on single purchase at Ashley Furniture retailers; pro rata share based on total valid claims from $9 million Common Voucher Fund, plus potential pro rata cash payment if attorneys' fees and costs awarded are less than $3 million

Tuft & Needle Deceptive Discount Advertising Settlement

Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products sold on its website. The defendant denies liability and wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims.

Paid Up to $75

Menard Bonded Abrasive Wheel Settlement

Menard Inc., Disston Company, and Gino Development allegedly failed to provide adequate disclosures regarding the date contained on Menard-branded PERFORMAX or MASTERFORCE bonded abrasive wheels. The defendants deny no wrongdoing is not explicitly stated on the page.

Rahil Doctor v. Posh Group, Inc. - Ticket Fee Settlement

Posh Group, Inc. allegedly charged California residents fees that were not included in the advertised ticket price when they purchased event tickets. Posh denies all wrongdoing and asserts that the settlement is not an admission of guilt or liability.

Team Group DRAM Settlement

Team Group is accused of misleading consumers about the advertised speeds of its DDR-3, DDR-4, and DDR-5 DRAM memory products, allegedly implying that the advertised speeds were "out of the box" speeds requiring no PC adjustments. Team Group denies the allegations and admits no wrongdoing. The parties agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continued litigation.

Paid Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund

Tom's of Maine Toothpaste Settlement

Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive allegedly engaged in deceptive and misleading business practices with respect to the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of certain Tom's toothpaste products made at their Sanford, Maine facility. The defendants deny wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and risks.