SpotHero Pricing Settlement
The amount of each Settlement Class Member's Settlement Benefit will depend on the average of the service fees paid by each Settlement Class Member.
What happened
SpotHero allegedly violated California law by not displaying the full price, including its service fee, until near the end of the checkout process when customers reserved parking spots on its website and mobile application. This practice, called drip pricing, is being resolved through this settlement. The defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who purchased at least one parking reservation through SpotHero's website or mobile application between July 1, 2024, and March 13, 2025, while in California, and used the "Map View" option to search for parking spots.
How to file
Submit your Claim Form online or mail your completed paper Claim Form so that it is postmarked by August 25, 2026. If you do nothing, you will automatically receive a credit voucher deposited into your SpotHero wallet.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Pricing Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products on its website. The defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims brought by consumers who purchased discounted mattresses.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries sold mattresses with fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the cover or be released if removed, causing economic harm and potential property or physical effects to consumers. The defendants deny all wrongdoing but are settling for judicial efficiency.
Pro rata share of $9 million voucher fund divided equally among all valid claims. Additional pro rata cash payment possible if attorneys' fees and costs awarded less than $3 million.
Cosequin® Dog Supplement Settlement
The defendants, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplement products in advertising and packaging. The defendants have agreed to pay $11.5 million to settle these claims without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Litigation Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to concerns about bonding separation and delamination that could cause breakage. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and inadequacy of the recall, seeking relief related to product advertising and marketing. The defendants deny any physical injuries resulted from the cranksets.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing and installing a replacement crankset, if applicable; otherwise automatic extended warranty coverage