Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement
$25–$150
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 21, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Nutramax Laboratories allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplements in advertising and packaging. The company has reached an $11.5 million settlement without admitting wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who resides in California and purchased qualifying canine Cosequin® products for personal use between May 3, 2016, and May 6, 2022. Qualifying products include Cosequin® DS Maximum Strength Chewable Tablets, Cosequin® DS Maximum Strength Plus MSM Chewable Tablets, Cosequin® Maximum Strength Plus MSM Chewable Tablets, Cosequin® with MSM Chewable Tablets, and certain soft chew varieties.
How to file
Submit a timely and valid Claim Form by July 21, 2026. Class members receive $25 per unit purchased, up to a maximum of $150. Claims can be submitted online at the settlement website.
Common questions
- How much does the Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: $25–$150. The total settlement fund is $11.5M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 21, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at cosequincasettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Cosequin Dog Supplement Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for August 13, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Christine Musthaler
- Justin Lytle
Defendants
- Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc.
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Michael H. PearsonPearson Warshaw LLP
- Matthew D. SchultzLevin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty and Proctor PA
- Jonathan B. CohenBryson Harris Suciu and DeMay PLLC
- Greg Frederic ColemanColeman Law PLLC
- Daniel K. BrysonBryson Harris Suciu and DeMay PLLC
- Andrew D. HathawayMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC
- Daniel L. WarshawPearson Warshaw, LLP
- Brenton J GoodmanLevin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty and Proctor PA
- Adam A EdwardsMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC
Counsel for defendants
- Scott A. ElderAlston and Bird LLP
- Kara L McCallAlston and Bird LLP
- John E Stephenson , JrAlston & Bird LLP
- Jenny A HergenrotherAlston and Bird LLP
- Jason D RosenbergAlston and Bird LLP
- Alan F PryorAlston and Bird LLP
- Kathy J. HuangAlston and Bird LLP
- Sean A. CommonsSidley Austin LLP
- Joshua A. GlikinShulman Rogers PA
- Celia Hope SpaldingSidley Austin LLP
- Amy P. LallySidley Austin LLP
- Adriane Kayoko PeraltaSidley Austin LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Schnucks Markets Sales Tax Settlement
Schnucks Markets allegedly illegally charged sales tax on the full retail price of purchases before applying rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price. The lawsuit claims Schnucks misled customers about the tax calculation and collected excess tax revenue.
…moreUp to $7
Skin360 BIPA Settlement
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, disclosing, and profiting from biometric identifiers and information from people who scanned their faces during Skin360 skin assessments without providing required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. The defendant denies wrongdoing and admits no violation.
…moreEqual payment to all valid claimants from the $4.7 million Settlement Fund, minus Settlement Administrator costs, attorneys' fees (up to one-third of the fund), and service payments to Class Representatives (up to $5,000 each)
Dr. Squatch Products Class Action Settlement
Plaintiffs alleged that Dr. Squatch represented certain shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, soap and other personal care products as natural when they contained synthetic ingredients. Dr. Squatch denies wrongdoing and maintains the products were properly labeled. The parties settled to avoid the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
…moreYour payment will be calculated pro rata based on the number of valid claim forms submitted by the settlement class.
Thinkware Dashcam Settlement
Thinkware Systems USA, Inc. is accused of misrepresenting and falsely advertising that its dashcam models featured a "Super Night Vision" function, while failing to disclose that this function was only available in parking mode. The defendant denies these allegations and wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
…morePro rata payment based on number of valid claims submitted