Settlements with no proof of purchase needed

WISP, Inc. Data Privacy Settlement

WISP, Inc. allegedly disclosed customers' personally identifiable information to third parties through Meta Pixel and other tracking technologies without consent, in violation of privacy laws including the Florida Security of Communications Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act. The defendant denies all claims and admits no wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.

Up to $18

State Farm Auto Insurance Settlement

State Farm allegedly breached its auto insurance policies by failing to pay full purchasing fees for total loss claims, including Alabama state and county sales taxes, ad valorem taxes and fees, and license/tag/school fees. State Farm denies any fault or wrongdoing.

Up to $20.50

Derick Dermatology Pixel Tracking Settlement

Derick Dermatology allegedly disclosed user information to third parties through pixels, cookies, code, and tracking or analytics tools on its website without permission. The defendant denies violating any law but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and business disruption.

Up to $12.50

Thriveworks Patient Privacy Settlement

Thriveworks allegedly disclosed sensitive information and private communications on its website to Google and LinkedIn without consent in violation of state and federal law. The defendants deny wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the costs of continuing the case.

Up to $10

Enroll Confidently Data Breach Settlement

Enroll Confidently Inc. experienced a data breach on or about February 13, 2024, resulting in temporary unauthorized access to or acquisition of customers' and employees' private information. The defendant is settling a class action lawsuit related to this incident. The defendant admits no wrongdoing in the settlement.

$100–$3,500

PowerSchool/Naviance Student Data Interception Settlement

PowerSchool, Hobsons, Heap, and Chicago Public Schools allegedly non-consensually intercepted students' confidential and sensitive communications while they used the Naviance education technology platform. The defendants allegedly violated privacy laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act, Illinois Eavesdropping Act, and Stored Communications Act. Defendants deny wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.

Pro rata (equal) share of the Settlement Fund after deducting notice and administration expenses, attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, and a service award

Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement

The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.

Up to $2,172.30

EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement

The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.

Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members

Barefoot Dreams Privacy Settlement

Barefoot Dreams disclosed customers' personally identifiable information to third parties through Meta Platforms and Attentive Mobile tracking technologies and other analytics/advertising technologies without consent, allegedly violating the Florida Security of Communications Act, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and the California Invasion of Privacy Act. The defendant denies all claims but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs.

Up to $8

Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement

Katherine Wright filed a lawsuit against Oldcastle APG West and related companies on behalf of herself and other job applicants. The defendants allegedly wronged applicants during the employment application process. The lawsuit is pending court approval of a proposed settlement.

Up to $1,664.40

Foster v. Leo Hamel Fine Jewelers Data Breach Settlement

Leo Hamel Fine Jewelers allegedly failed to properly secure and safeguard current and former employees' personal information, which was accessed by an unauthorized person in a cybersecurity incident on or about November 10, 2022. The defendant denies the allegations and contends it was complying with applicable state law.

Up to $25

LA Financial Data Breach Settlement

LA Financial Federal Credit Union experienced a data breach on or about June 10, 2024, that compromised the personally identifiable information (PII) of settlement class members, including names, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, account numbers, payment card numbers, and other sensitive data. The defendant has agreed to a $725,000 settlement to address the breach.

$50–$5,100

Motility Data Breach Settlement

Motility Software Solutions suffered a cybersecurity incident in August 2025 that resulted in potential unauthorized access to or acquisition of personal information including names, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers. The company has agreed to settle the litigation without admitting wrongdoing.

$75–$5,000

Grubhub Delivery Fee Settlement

Grubhub made false or misleading representations regarding delivery fees, service fees, and menu prices on its delivery orders. Grubhub denies these allegations and denies any wrongdoing.

Up to $10

Mai Kai Restaurant Wage Violation Settlement

Restaurant servers at Mai Kai Restaurant and Polynesian Show in Fort Lauderdale, Florida alleged wage violations under the Florida Minimum Wage Act and Fair Labor Standards Act. The defendant agreed to settle for $85,000 to avoid litigation costs and uncertainty. The defendant denies any wrongdoing.

Approximately $2.27 per hour worked, but could be less after deductions for attorneys' fees, costs, class representative service award, and administration expenses

Elsie Rooftop Wage and Hour Settlement

A former tipped worker sued Elsie Rooftop alleging the restaurant failed to pay proper overtime wages and related wage and hour claims. The defendant denies the allegations and no court ruling was made on the merits. The parties settled to avoid continued litigation.

Payment is estimated based on the number of weeks worked between July 3, 2018 and November 13, 2025; each tipped worker receives the same dollar amount per week worked. Payment amount shows as [AMOUNT] on this page. 20% is subject to payroll tax withholdings (reported on Form W-2); 80% is not subject to deductions (reported on Form 1099).

Munoz v. PHH Corp. Settlement

PHH and its affiliates allegedly violated laws prohibiting kickback payments in connection with mortgage settlement services. Class members purchased private mortgage insurance that was included in PHH's captive mortgage reinsurance agreements. The defendants have denied any wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.

Up to $875

THR Property Management Security Deposit Settlement

THR Property Management L.P., Invitation Homes, Inc., and their subsidiaries are settling a class action lawsuit brought by Florida tenants. The defendants deny the allegations and admit no wrongdoing, but have agreed to pay $682,680 to settle claims related to security deposits from leases signed between February 15, 2021 and October 31, 2025.

Up to $20

St. Joseph Hospital MyChart Data Breach Settlement

St. Joseph Hospital of Nashua allegedly unlawfully collected, used, and disclosed personally identifiable information and protected health information of persons who used its MyChart patient portal account. The hospital denies these allegations and admits no wrongdoing.

Up to $50

Bestway Spa Pump Class Action Settlement

Customers claimed that certain Bestway Spa Pumps sold between May 2021 and May 2024 were defective and were subject to a recall conducted in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Bestway denies it did anything wrong. The parties reached a proposed settlement to resolve the lawsuit on a class action basis.

Up to $75

Beer v. Fandango Media Settlement

Fandango Media allegedly failed to timely disclose a mandatory Convenience Fee for online movie ticket purchases through Fandango to California theaters between June 2020 and June 2024, and violated laws by offering FanClub memberships with $10 monthly credits or promo codes that expire after 30 days to California and Washington consumers. Fandango denies wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.

$3.25–$10.75

AVI-SPL Employment Application Settlement

AVI-SPL, LLC is alleged to have posted job openings in Washington without disclosing the wage scale, salary range, or a general description of benefits and compensation. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it violated no law. The parties have reached a proposed settlement.

Settlement includes a payment by Defendant of $443,374.60 to $650,000.00, depending on how many Class Members submit a claim

Bradford Health Data Incident Settlement

Bradford Health Partners, LLC and Bradford Health Services, LLC experienced a cybersecurity incident in November 2023 that resulted in unauthorized access to or acquisition of customers' private information, including names, dates of birth, identification numbers, Social Security numbers, medical information, health insurance information, and financial information. The company has agreed to pay $900,000 and implement additional security measures to resolve the class action lawsuit.

$150–$5,000

Chiechi v. Albany Park Settlement

Albany Park deceptively advertised discounts for products on its website AlbanyPark.com, including misrepresenting the discount amounts. The lawsuit claims violations of California consumer protection laws including the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law, and Unfair Competition Law, as well as common law fraud and unjust enrichment claims. Albany Park denies all liability and wrongdoing.

Up to $115

Compex Legal Services Data Breach Settlement

An unauthorized user gained access to Compex Legal Services' systems in a cyber incident that was discovered in April 2024. The incident impacted personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) of class members. Compex has agreed to settle the claims without admitting wrongdoing.

$100–$5,200

New York Renaissance Faire Ticket Fee Settlement

Renaissance Entertainment Productions, Inc. allegedly failed to properly disclose service fees for tickets to its New York Renaissance Faire in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendant denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainties of continuing the case.

Up to $20

SpotHero Drip Pricing Settlement

SpotHero, Inc. allegedly violated California law by not displaying the full price, including its service fee, to reserve parking spots on its website and mobile application until near the end of the checkout process, which Plaintiff alleges constitutes unlawful drip pricing. Defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing.

Each Settlement Class Member's Settlement Benefit depends on the average of the service fees paid by that member.

FitOn VPPA Settlement

FitOn allegedly disclosed its subscribers' personally identifiable information to third parties without consent and in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The defendant denies it violated any law.

Up to $10

AOD Federal Credit Union Data Breach Settlement

AOD Federal Credit Union experienced unauthorized access to its network from August 8-9, 2024, resulting in potential exposure of members' personally identifiable information including names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, government IDs, health insurance information, and tax identification numbers. The defendant denies any wrongdoing.

$75–$5,000

Malik Tucker v. King County Settlement

King County detained people at the King County Jail for more than 48 hours without a probable cause determination between January 2, 2021, and April 23, 2025. The lawsuit challenged these detention practices, and King County agreed to pay compensation to affected individuals.

$150–$1,500

Banner Health Data Breach Settlement

Banner Health allegedly disclosed patients' personally identifiable information and protected health information to third parties including Meta (Facebook) and Google through tracking technologies on its website and patient portal. This allegedly violated patients' privacy rights and applicable laws. Banner denies all wrongdoing.

Up to $20

Columbus Regional Health Data Breach Settlement

Columbus Regional Health allegedly disclosed confidential personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) to third-party technologies without patient consent. The defendant denies all claims and maintains it did nothing wrong but agreed to the settlement to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.

Up to $25.50

Mount Sinai Data Breach Settlement

Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida disclosed protected health information and personally identifying information of patients through tracking, analytics, and advertising technologies on its website and patient portal to third parties. The disclosure occurred between June 10, 2021 and September 18, 2025.

Up to $20

Period Tracker Data Privacy Settlement (Flo, Google, Flurry)

Between November 2016 and February 2019, the Flo period and ovulation tracker app allegedly incorporated code from third-party software development kits (from Flurry, Meta, and Google) through which user information related to menstruation and pregnancy was allegedly shared without proper legal authorization. Google agreed to pay $48 million, Flo agreed to pay $8 million, and Flurry agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle. All defendants deny wrongdoing and assert they did nothing wrong.

Not stated

Hughes v. Smith County Jail Detention Settlement

Smith County detained people at the Smith County Jail for more than two days after they completed their custodial felony sentences. A federal court approved a settlement requiring the County to pay compensation to those affected.

From $685.87

TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Payment Settlement

The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc., alleging the company failed to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties reached a settlement.

Amount varies by individual; specified in mailed/emailed notice; to be paid in five installments between December 16, 2024 and April 10, 2028

NCAA Concussion Settlement Medical Monitoring Program

The NCAA is providing a medical monitoring program for former student-athletes who may have suffered concussions while playing NCAA-sanctioned sports. The settlement offers free medical screening and evaluations to eligible class members.

Free medical screening and free medical evaluations up to two times

USAA Late Fee Settlement

USAA charged Maryland policyholders late fees on their insurance policies prior to 2020. Following a market conduct examination by the Maryland Insurance Commissioner, USAA refunded the principal amount of these late fees but did not include accrued interest and/or gains earned on those fees. Plaintiffs allege that customers should have received the interest and gains in addition to the principal refund. USAA denies it did anything wrong.

Gilbert v AT&T Mobility Services LLC Wage and Hour Settlement

AT&T Mobility Services LLC is alleged to have violated California wage and hour laws by failing to pay employees properly and/or reimburse business expenses. The company is also alleged to have violated the California Private Attorney General Act. AT&T admits no wrongdoing.

QuoteWizard Telemarketing Settlement

QuoteWizard.com, LLC sent telemarketing text messages to people whose telephone numbers were on the National Do-Not-Call Registry without consent. The lawsuit claimed the company violated telemarketing regulations by making unsolicited text messages to consumers.

Cantu v. Google LLC Employment Settlement

Google is settling an employment-related class action lawsuit. Class members will receive cash payments from the settlement, and in exchange will release claims against Google related to their employment.

Estimated individual share will be provided in the Notice of Estimated Class Settlement Share

Gelasio v. Educative, Inc. - Automatic Subscription Renewal Settlement

Educative is accused of automatically renewing customers' digital subscriptions and charging their payment methods without providing the required disclosures and authorizations under California law. Educative denies these claims. The parties agreed to a settlement to avoid further litigation.

$11.93–$23.86