EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Up to $2 million total distributed to eligible applicants
What happened
Meathead Movers allegedly engaged in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) from at least 2017. The company has agreed to a settlement without admitting wrongdoing, providing up to $2 million to affected job applicants.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who applied for employment at Meathead Movers between January 1, 2017 and 2026. The EEOC will determine eligibility based on the application period and information provided on the claims questionnaire.
How to file
Complete a Claims Questionnaire under oath and submit it by July 27, 2026 by mail or online. The EEOC will use your responses to determine eligibility and award amount, and will send notification letters and checks after the claims process is completed.
In the news
- Feds Try To Bankrupt a Moving Company for Hiring Strong, Young MoversFreerepublic.com · July 21, 2025
- Meathead feds target California movers over nonexistent age discrimination: ‘Weaponization of government’New York Post · June 5, 2025
- Fed lawsuit: Hire old people for heavy manual labor — or else!New York Post · December 11, 2023
- Meathead Movers sued over age discrimination after touting 'student-athlete' workersBiztoc.com · December 10, 2023
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Novant Health Timeclock Rounding Collective Action Settlement
Novant Health allegedly used a timeclock rounding policy from September 2021 through February 2023 that caused hourly employees to lose overtime pay. Novant Health denies wrongdoing and asserts all employees were fully and properly paid. The parties settled the dispute to avoid trial costs and risks.
Your proportional share of the settlement calculated based on your length of employment in an hourly position during the class period (September 19, 2021 through February 11, 2023). Up to $403,730 total is available for employee payouts.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The lawsuit challenges whether the 80/20, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan was properly administered and terminated by the defendants in accordance with ERISA (federal retirement law). The defendants are accused of violations in how they handled the Plan's administration and termination. Defendants deny all claims and admit no wrongdoing.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
Job applicants sued The Seven Motor Corporation for failing to disclose wage scales or salary ranges in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
SkinSpirit Essential Wage and Hour Settlement
SkinSpirit Essential allegedly violated California wage and hour laws by improperly classifying employees or failing to pay required wages. The company is settling a class action lawsuit filed by former employee Sarah Rad on behalf of non-exempt employees who worked for the company.