EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Last verified July 12, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 27, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who applied for employment at Meathead Movers, Inc. between January 1, 2017 and 2026 may be eligible to receive a monetary award from the settlement.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Monetary award for age discrimination in hiring
Eligible class members who applied for employment at Meathead Movers between January 1, 2017 and 2026 and were adversely affected by the company's discriminatory hiring practices may receive a monetary award. The EEOC determines eligibility and award amounts based on the claims questionnaire.
Who is in the class
Individuals who applied for employment at Meathead Movers during the claims period of January 1, 2017 to 2026 may be eligible to receive a monetary award under the Consent Decree.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Complete a Claims Questionnaire and submit it by mail or online to the Claims Administrator no later than July 27, 2026. Your responses must be provided under oath and penalty of perjury. The EEOC will review your application and notify you if you are eligible for a monetary award. If you do nothing, you will receive no money from the settlement.
Common questions
- How much does the EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members. The total settlement fund is $2M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 27, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- ILYM Group, Inc. is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at eeocvmeatheadmoverssettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendants
- Does
- Meathead Movers Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Derek W LiEqual Employment Opportunity Commission
- Sophia Noel TaraziUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Jillian EdmondsUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Austin CaseU.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Taylor M. MarkeyBokhour Law Group, PC
- Nakkisa AkhavanUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Gaganjyot Kaur SandhuU.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Andrea E RingerUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Anna Y. ParkUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
- Feds Try To Bankrupt a Moving Company for Hiring Strong, Young MoversFreerepublic.com · July 21, 2025
- Meathead feds target California movers over nonexistent age discrimination: ‘Weaponization of government’New York Post · June 5, 2025
- Fed lawsuit: Hire old people for heavy manual labor — or else!New York Post · December 11, 2023
- Meathead Movers sued over age discrimination after touting 'student-athlete' workersBiztoc.com · December 10, 2023
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more