Hill v. BrandSafway Services Class Action Settlement
Up to $1,632.11
Last verified September 5, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 7, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Plaintiff Jeffrey Hill sued BrandSafway and related companies, alleging that their job postings for open positions in Washington failed to disclose wage and/or benefits information as required. The defendants dispute the claims and contend they have not violated any law. The lawsuit is pending in King County Superior Court, and a settlement has been proposed pending court approval.
Do you qualify?
Class members are applicants who applied for employment with BrandSafway Services and related entities for positions posted in Washington without the required wage and/or benefits disclosures. The settlement class is defined by the job applications that were submitted in response to such postings.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Settlement payment
$1,632.11 eachClass members who were applicants for employment with BrandSafway Services and related entities and submit a claim form are eligible for an estimated payment from the settlement.
Who is in the class
Jeffrey Hill ("Plaintiff" or "Class Representative"), filed a lawsuit against Defendants on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated applicants. The lawsuit, Hill v. BrandSafway Services, LLC, et al., No. 24-2-14400-5 SEA (the "Lawsuit") is currently pending in King County Superior Court before Judge Samuel Chung. Plaintiff claimed in the lawsuit that Defendants' job postings for open positions in Washington did not disclose wage and/or benefits information.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form by September 7, 2026 using your Login ID and PIN found in the Notice you received, either online at the settlement website, or by mail or email to the Settlement Administrator. You must submit a claim to receive a payment from the settlement.
Common questions
- How much does the Hill v. BrandSafway Services Class Action Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Up to $1,632.11. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Hill v. BrandSafway Services Class Action Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 7, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Hill v. BrandSafway Services Class Action Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at epoasettlementbsw.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Hill v. BrandSafway Services Class Action Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for October 7, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more