Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement
Up to $1,664.40
Last verified July 12, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 31, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Katherine Wright filed a lawsuit against Oldcastle APG West and related companies on behalf of herself and other job applicants. The defendants allegedly wronged applicants during the employment application process. The lawsuit is pending court approval of a proposed settlement.
Do you qualify?
Applicants for employment with Oldcastle APG West, Inc. and/or its related entities who are part of the class in this lawsuit are eligible to receive settlement payments.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Settlement Payment
$1,664.40 eachA class member who submits a Claim Form by the deadline is eligible to receive an estimated payment from the settlement fund.
Who is in the class
a class of similarly situated applicants for employment with Oldcastle APG West, Inc. and/or its related entities
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form online using your Notice ID and PIN, or send it to the Settlement Administrator by mail or email. The deadline to submit is July 31, 2026.
Common questions
- How much does the Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: Up to $1,664.40. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 31, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at oawsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Wright v. Oldcastle APG West Employment Application Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 4, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more