Gilbert v AT&T Mobility Services LLC Wage and Hour Settlement
What happened
AT&T Mobility Services LLC is alleged to have violated California wage and hour laws by failing to pay employees properly and/or reimburse business expenses. The company is also alleged to have violated the California Private Attorney General Act. AT&T admits no wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Non-exempt employees who worked for AT&T Mobility Services LLC in California during the class period from September 21, 2022 to September 3, 2025. This includes both former and current employees.
How to file
You do not need to submit a claim form to participate—if you do nothing, you will automatically be eligible to receive an Individual Class Payment and/or Individual PAGA Payment based on the number of workweeks you worked during the class period, as documented in the defendant's records. The court will determine final payment amounts at the March 23, 2026 hearing.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30