THR Property Management Security Deposit Settlement
Up to $20
What happened
THR Property Management L.P., Invitation Homes, Inc., and their subsidiaries are settling a class action lawsuit brought by Florida tenants. The defendants deny the allegations and admit no wrongdoing, but have agreed to pay $682,680 to settle claims related to security deposits from leases signed between February 15, 2021 and October 31, 2025.
Do you qualify?
All persons in Florida who signed a lease with THR Property Management, Invitation Homes, or their subsidiaries and paid a security deposit between February 15, 2021 and October 31, 2025. Excluded are the presiding judge, appellate judges, their immediate families, the defendants, those who have opted out, attorneys of record, and anyone who already released these claims.
How to file
Fill out the Online Claim Form on the settlement website and select a payment method by August 14, 2026. No proof of purchase or documentation is required to receive the $20 payment.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Robinhood Order Flow Settlement
Robinhood allegedly routed customer market orders for equities in a manner that resulted in execution prices worse than the National Best Bid/Offer. Customers' buy orders were executed at prices higher than the best available offer, and sell orders were executed at prices lower than the best available bid. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability or wrongdoing.
Up to $17.60
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Surplus Proceeds Settlement
When 27 Michigan counties foreclosed on properties for tax nonpayment, they sold the properties at auction and kept the difference between the taxes owed and the sales proceeds. The lawsuit alleged that the counties violated property owners' rights by retaining these "surplus proceeds" without distributing them to the former owners.
Class members can generally recover 125 percent of their properties' surplus proceeds, minus any attorneys' fees and costs. This number is subject to certain potential adjustments.
Clackamas County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Clackamas County allegedly failed to provide owners with proceeds from tax-foreclosed property sales that exceeded unpaid taxes and fees, or retained foreclosed properties worth more than the tax debt without compensation. The county denies wrongdoing and has settled to avoid costly litigation and address liability from the Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision.
Settlement Payments of "surplus proceeds"