Finance class action settlements
Class action settlements over bank fees, overdraft charges, overcharges, and other financial-services practices.
Finance & banking settlements by the numbers
A settlement fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not what any one claimant receives — most funds are divided among everyone who files. Settlements are negotiated agreements, and defendants typically deny wrongdoing rather than being found liable.
The 35 settlements in this category that publish a fund, grouped by size. Most cluster low and a few are very large — which is why the headline figure above is a median rather than an average.
| Fund size | Settlements | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | 5 | 14% | |
| $1M – $5M | 11 | 31% | |
| $5M – $25M | 12 | 34% | |
| $25M – $100M | 3 | 9% | |
| $100M and up | 4 | 11% |
A fund is the total a defendant agreed to pay, not an individual payout.
Get new claim opportunities by email
Free alerts for new settlements and deadlines. Unsubscribe anytime.
Accepting claims now
Bradberry v. Equifax Information Services LLC - Duplicate Collection Accounts Settlement
Equifax allegedly reported the same collection account more than once on consumer credit reports, which the lawsuit claims violates the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Equifax denies wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Patton v Trinity Settlement
Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells, in violation of Oklahoma law. The defendant denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs of continued litigation.
Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
Statebridge Mortgage Servicer Settlement
Statebridge, a mortgage loan servicer, allegedly charged late fees, default-related fees, and interest on junior-lien mortgage loans during periods when borrowers were not receiving monthly mortgage statements and when loans were charged off. The settlement addresses improper fees and interest charges assessed between November 2, 2023 and May 14, 2025.
Finance cases in litigation
Filed and being fought in court. These are allegations — there is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet.
Rojas v. Signature Property Solutions Class Action
A proposed class action filed against Signature Property Solutions, Inc. The complaint alleges unspecified claims; based solely on the limited docket information available, the nature of the allegations cannot be determined from the caption and initial filings provided.
Jahanbakhsh v. Greystar Management Services Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against property management and software companies Greystar, RealPage, and Yardi. The complaint was removed to federal court, but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entries alone, which contain only procedural notices and removal documentation.
Maurer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
A proposed class action has been filed against Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., apparently concerning personal injury or wrongful conduct. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case appears to involve claims that could affect customers or account holders of the defendant financial services firm.
Miller v. InDebted USA Consumer Credit Class Action
This proposed class action alleges consumer credit-related claims against InDebted USA, Inc. The case was filed in federal court under the consumer credit classification, suggesting the lawsuit concerns debt collection, lending practices, or related consumer financial transactions. Specific allegations are not available from the docket information provided.
GoFundMe Consumer Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against GoFundMe, Inc. in federal court. While specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available, the case appears to involve claims by consumers regarding GoFundMe's services or conduct.
Baldwin v. Health Payment Systems Inc
A proposed class action against Health Payment Systems Inc alleging claims related to personal property matters. Based on the defendant's business focus on health payment processing, the lawsuit apparently concerns billing, payment processing, or related financial practices affecting consumers or patients.
Bronstin v. United Debt Settlement Class Action
A proposed class action against United Debt Settlement, LLC filed in federal court. Based on the defendant's business name, the case apparently concerns allegations related to debt settlement services, though specific claims cannot be determined from the available docket information.
Gordon v. DraftKings Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against DraftKings, Inc. and Gus III, LLC in federal court in Massachusetts. The docket entries do not disclose the specific allegations, but the case appears to involve claims that could affect ordinary users or participants of the defendants' services.
Williams v. The CBE Group Consumer Credit Class Action
A proposed class action filed by Ebonie Williams against The CBE Group, Inc., apparently concerning consumer credit practices or disclosures. The complaint alleges violations or wrongful conduct related to consumer credit matters, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entry alone.
Smith v. Waypoint Resource Group Consumer Credit Class Action
A proposed class action filed against Waypoint Resource Group, LLC, a debt collection or consumer credit company. The lawsuit, classified under consumer credit law (28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)), alleges claims that may involve improper debt collection practices, fair credit reporting violations, or related consumer finance violations affecting ordinary consumers.
Collette v. TruStage Financial Group Class Action
A proposed class action filed by Tammy Collette against TruStage Financial Group, Inc., apparently concerning a contractual dispute. The complaint has been filed in federal court, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entries provided.
Hussain v. MortgagePros LLC
A proposed class action against MortgagePros LLC, a mortgage services company. The complaint was filed by Ameena Hussain in federal court in Michigan, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entry provided. The case involves a jury demand and was filed in July 2026.
Closed to new claims
Past the filing deadline — kept so you can look up what a case was about and what it paid.
Chastain v Lime Rock Resources Operating Company Settlement
Lime Rock Resources Operating Company allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to owners of oil and gas production proceeds from Oklahoma wells under the Oklahoma Payment of Royalties and Statutory Interest Act (PRSA). Defendants deny all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and uncertainty of continued litigation.
Paid Net Settlement Fund (after deductions for attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, administration, notice, distribution costs, and case contribution award) distributed according to the Allocation Methodology in the Settlement Agreement
Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement
Liberty Mutual allegedly mismanaged the investment and administration of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan in violation of ERISA, the federal law governing retirement plans. The company has agreed to settle these claims.
HSBC Direct Savings Account Settlement
HSBC Bank USA allegedly failed to pay interest in accordance with Direct Savings Account terms for customers who initiated ACH transfers through HSBC's web portal.
Nationstar Mortgage Lawsuit Settlement
Nationstar Mortgage allegedly charged borrowers unauthorized fees on their mortgage accounts, including fees for service of process for unknown spouses/tenants, property maintenance that was never performed, property inspections that never occurred, and attorneys' fees from unsuccessful foreclosure actions. The defendants deny any wrongdoing.
THR Property Management Security Deposit Settlement
THR Property Management L.P., Invitation Homes, Inc., and their subsidiaries are settling a class action lawsuit brought by Florida tenants. The defendants deny the allegations and admit no wrongdoing, but have agreed to pay $682,680 to settle claims related to security deposits from leases signed between February 15, 2021 and October 31, 2025.
Paid Up to $20
Flagstar Data Breach Settlement
Flagstar Bank suffered two data breaches in January 2021 and December 2021 that exposed the personal information of approximately 2.2 million individuals. The bank is paying to settle claims related to these breaches, though Flagstar denies wrongdoing and admits no liability.
Paid $60–$25,000
Munoz v. PHH Corp. Mortgage Settlement
PHH Corp. and its affiliates allegedly violated federal law prohibiting kickbacks in connection with mortgage settlement services. Specifically, they allegedly improperly included private mortgage insurance costs within PHH's captive mortgage reinsurance agreements. The defendants have denied any wrongdoing, and the court has not decided the merits; instead, the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
Paid Up to $875
LA Financial Data Breach Settlement
LA Financial Federal Credit Union experienced a data breach on or about June 10, 2024, that compromised the personally identifiable information (PII) of settlement class members, including names, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, account numbers, payment card numbers, and other sensitive data. The defendant has agreed to a $725,000 settlement to address the breach.
Paid $50–$5,100
Clackamas County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Clackamas County allegedly failed to provide owners with proceeds from tax-foreclosed property sales that exceeded unpaid taxes and fees, or retained foreclosed properties worth more than the tax debt without compensation. The county denies wrongdoing and has settled to avoid costly litigation and address liability from the Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision.
Paid Settlement Payments of "surplus proceeds"
Surplus Proceeds Settlement
When 27 Michigan counties foreclosed on properties for tax nonpayment, they sold the properties at auction and kept the difference between the taxes owed and the sales proceeds. The lawsuit alleged that the counties violated property owners' rights by retaining these "surplus proceeds" without distributing them to the former owners.
Paid Class members can generally recover 125 percent of their properties' surplus proceeds, minus any attorneys' fees and costs. This number is subject to certain potential adjustments.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Robinhood Order Flow Settlement
Robinhood allegedly routed customer market orders for equities in a manner that resulted in execution prices worse than the National Best Bid/Offer. Customers' buy orders were executed at prices higher than the best available offer, and sell orders were executed at prices lower than the best available bid. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability or wrongdoing.
Paid Up to $17.60
Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement
Westlake Services, LLC allegedly improperly charged borrowers fees when they made payments on their accounts through ACI Payments, Inc. The company has agreed to establish a $1.2 million settlement fund to compensate affected borrowers.
Bank of America ATM Balance Inquiry Fees Settlement
Bank of America assessed fees to customers for balance inquiries at ATMs owned and operated by FCTI, Inc., located at 7-Eleven stores. Bank of America will pay $2,250,000 to settle the class action lawsuit over these charges.
Paid Equal pro-rata distribution of the Net Settlement Fund based on the number of Current Accountholders and Past Accountholders who submitted a Valid Claim
Berton v Aetna Infertility Coverage Settlement
Aetna allegedly denied equal insurance coverage for infertility treatment (IUI, ICI) to LGBTQ+ individuals seeking to get pregnant. While straight couples only needed to attest to 12 months of frequent intercourse to qualify as infertile and receive coverage, LGBTQ+ individuals had to pay out-of-pocket for up to 12 cycles of artificial insemination first to qualify for coverage. Aetna denies wrongdoing and no final court ruling has been made.
Paid $5,714.29–$10,000
Genesis Financial Solutions Maryland Consumer Lending Settlement
Genesis Financial Solutions engaged in consumer lending and credit-related business practices in Maryland involving personal loans of less than $25,000 that allegedly violated the Maryland Consumer Loan Law and the Maryland Credit Services Businesses Act. Genesis denies wrongdoing or liability.
GYEN Class Action Settlement
Defendant GMO-Z.com Trust Company, Inc. allegedly violated New York and California law by failing to provide accurate disclosure concerning the stability of GYEN (a cryptocurrency) during the settlement class period. Plaintiffs allege that when GYEN became unpegged from the Japanese yen, Settlement Class members lost money as a result of this lack of disclosure.
Paid Your recovery will vary depending on the amount of GYEN purchased, prices, transaction dates, and total losses; distributions will be made based on the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court.
Leasing Expenses Co. Restitution
On November 23, 2020, the New York State Attorney General filed a lawsuit alleging that Leasing Expenses Co. and NLS Equipment Finance were continuing illegal collection practices against consumers. They were collecting payments on leases that a court had previously cancelled in a case against affiliated company Northern Leasing Systems, and were using fraud and deceptive practices that targeted many of the same victims. The court ordered them to stop these practices and return all money collected on the unlawful leases.
AMEX Antitrust Settlement
American Express had rules in its merchant agreements that prohibited merchants from encouraging customers to pay with a different card that charged lower fees. Plaintiffs alleged these anti-steering rules caused merchants to raise prices to cover Amex fees, resulting in all customers—including those not using Amex cards—paying more. American Express denies wrongdoing.
Discover Card Merchant Class Action Settlement
Discover allegedly misclassified certain Discover-issued consumer credit cards as commercial credit cards starting in 2007, causing merchants to incur excessive interchange fees. Discover denies the claims, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and risks.
Albert Corporation Military Lending Act Settlement
Albert Corporation and Albert Cash, LLC offered a cash advance product called Albert Instant that allegedly violated the Military Lending Act, Truth in Lending Act, and Georgia Payday Lending Act by not properly disclosing terms and exceeding interest-rate caps. The defendants deny all allegations but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation.
Paid Up to $30
Garnet Health Medical Center 403(b) Plan Settlement
Garnet Health Medical Center allegedly administered its 403(b) retirement savings plan in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the federal law that regulates retirement plans. The defendant denies all claims and admits no wrongdoing.
Paid Net Settlement Amount (after deductions for administrative expenses, attorneys' fees, and case contribution awards) to be allocated according to Court-approved Plan of Allocation
Capital One 360 Savings Account Interest Rate Settlement
Capital One allegedly failed to raise interest rates on its 360 Savings account to match the higher rates paid on the 360 Performance Savings account. The company allegedly deceptively marketed the 360 Savings account and concealed that it was no longer Capital One's high-yield online savings account and hid the existence of the higher-rate 360 Performance Savings account from 360 Savings accountholders.
Paid The Settlement Administrator has not yet determined the amount of individual Class Cash Payments. Payments of $5 or more will be mailed by check unless electronic payment is elected; payments under $5 require electronic payment election.
Multnomah County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Multnomah County allegedly violated plaintiffs' rights by failing to provide proceeds from sales of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes and fees, in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision. Multnomah County denies wrongdoing but has agreed to settle to avoid costly litigation.
Paid Surplus proceeds from the sale of tax-foreclosed properties that exceeded unpaid taxes, fees, and costs