Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 8, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Westlake Services, LLC allegedly improperly charged borrowers fees when they made payments on their accounts through ACI Payments, Inc. The company has agreed to establish a $1.2 million settlement fund to compensate affected borrowers.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who was charged a fee for making a payment on a Westlake Services account through ACI Payments, Inc. between June 20, 2022, and August 18, 2025.
Who is in the class
all natural persons with a retail installment contract assigned to Westlake who, between June 20, 2022, and the date of Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement, paid a convenience fee to ACI Payments, Inc. ("ACI") in connection with a payment the person was making on a Westlake account, where the payment was made either on the due date of the payment, after the due date of the payment, or where the due date is unknown, based on Westlake's records.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Complete a Claim Form online at the settlement website before July 8, 2026. You can choose to receive payment via paper check, electronic transfer (PayPal, Venmo, Zelle), or Westlake Account Credit (mail required).
Common questions
- How much does the Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $1.2M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 8, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement?
- No. You can file without a receipt or proof of purchase. You attest that you qualify and submit basic details, though claims are still subject to review and submitting a false claim is a crime.
- Is the Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Simpluris is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at klarefeesettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Klare v. Westlake Services Payment Fee Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for April 16, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Michael Klare
Defendants
- Does
- Westlake Services, LLC
Counsel for plaintiffs
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Visa and Mastercard allegedly violated antitrust laws by creating operating rules that prohibited independent ATM operators from charging lower access fees for transactions on competing networks. This forced cardholders to pay higher ATM surcharges than necessary. Visa and Mastercard deny the claims.
…moreSettlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Visa and Mastercard are accused of charging cardholders excessive access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs (ATMs not owned by Visa, Mastercard, banks, or other financial institutions). Claimants allege the payment networks' operating rules constituted price fixing and violated federal and state antitrust laws by enabling higher ATM fees than should have been charged. Visa and Mastercard deny wrongdoing but have agreed to settle.
…moreEach eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.
…more