CClaimWatch
finance

CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement

Last verified July 28, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases

What happened

Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.

Do you qualify?

Eligible victims are consumers who entered into lease agreements with Tempoe from January 1, 2015, to September 11, 2023, where the lease was extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term, and Tempoe failed to provide the required additional disclosures.

How to file

Contact JND Legal Administration, the settlement administrator, by calling 1 (877)-753-0307, emailing info@cfpb-tempoe.org, or writing to Tempoe, LLC Redress Matter, c/o JND Legal Administration, P.O. Box 91054, Seattle, WA 98111. Distribution is ongoing as of October 24, 2024.

Common questions

How much does the CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement pay?
The total settlement fund is $192M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
Is the CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement notice real, or a scam?
JND Legal Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at consumerfinance.gov. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
How long until I get paid from the CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement?
Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 11, 2023; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
What happens if I do nothing?
You receive no payment, and in most class actions you also give up the right to sue Tempoe, LLC separately over these same claims.

This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.

More finance settlements

View all →
September 17, 2026finance

Patton v Trinity Settlement - Oil & Gas Royalty Payments

Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells. Trinity denies wrongdoing but agreed to the proposed settlement to avoid the costs and uncertainty of continued litigation.

November 5, 2026No proof neededconsumer products

Schnucks Markets Rewards Points Sales Tax Settlement

Schnucks Markets allegedly charged customers sales tax on the full price of purchases before applying loyalty rewards points discounts, instead of calculating tax on the discounted price after points were redeemed. The lawsuit claimed Schnucks illegally collected excess sales tax and failed to properly inform customers about this practice.

Up to $7

November 24, 2026finance

Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement

The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.

Up to $80

December 21, 2026consumer products

Kroger Rx Savings Club Settlement

Kroger allegedly failed to consider its Rx Savings Club or Health Savings Club prices when determining "usual and customary" (U&C) prices submitted for insurance claims. Plaintiffs contend Kroger should have used its lower Savings Club prices when calculating U&C prices, resulting in customers paying higher insurance copays. Kroger denies wrongdoing and maintains it correctly reported retail prices as U&C prices. The court has not decided the merits.

Payments calculated based on the amount a claimant paid for prescription drugs from Kroger where prescription insurance benefits were used.