Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 22, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Liberty Mutual allegedly mismanaged the investment and administration of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan in violation of ERISA, the federal law governing retirement plans. The company has agreed to settle these claims.
Do you qualify?
All participants and beneficiaries of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan from April 10, 2014 through December 31, 2025, excluding the defendants.
How to file
Former Participants must submit a Former Participant Claim Form postmarked or electronically filed by August 22, 2026 to receive their share. Current Participants do not need to take any action to participate in the settlement.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 22, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Analytics Consulting LLC is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at libertymutual401ksettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 2, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Scott Diehl
- Edward Lief
- Mark Severn
- Andrew Loring
- Mary Ann Stocum
- Yusuf Ahmed
Defendants
- James Kelleher
- John Does 1-40
- Christopher Peirce
- Melanie Foley
- Dennis Langwell
- Neeti Bhalla
- Mark Touhey
- Mark Kelleher
+ 3 more
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Troy A. DolesSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Ruben R. ChapaSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Nathan StumpSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Matthew E. LaydenSchlichter Bogard & Denton, LLP
- Alexander L. BraitbergSchlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP.
- Christopher C. NaumesThe Naumes Law Group, LLC
- Scott T. ApkingSchlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP
- Michael A, WolffSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Kurt C. StruckhoffSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Joel RohlfSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Jerome J. SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Andrew D. SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLC
Counsel for defendants
- Nicole PachecoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Nicholle Patricia KnappSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Mark KelleherPRO SE
- Michael S. HinesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Mary Estelle GrinmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- James R. CarrollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Eben P. ColbySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Bradberry v. Equifax Information Services LLC - Duplicate Collection Accounts Settlement
Equifax allegedly reported the same collection account more than once on consumer credit reports, which the lawsuit claims violates the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Equifax denies wrongdoing, and the parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Patton v Trinity Settlement
Trinity Operating (USG) LLC allegedly failed to pay statutory interest on late payments to oil and gas producers for production proceeds from Oklahoma wells, in violation of Oklahoma law. The defendant denies all wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the costs of continued litigation.
Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
The City of Overland charged individuals Special Deterrent Fees. The court has approved a settlement requiring the city to refund these fees to eligible class members.
Up to $80
CFPB v. Tempoe LLC - Consumer Lease Settlement
Tempoe, LLC, a consumer finance leasing company, engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by failing to provide required additional disclosures to consumers whose leases were extended on a month-to-month basis for more than six months after the initial term. On September 11, 2023, the CFPB issued a consent order imposing a permanent ban on consumer leasing and a $2 million penalty.