Liberty Mutual ERISA 401(k) Settlement
What happened
Liberty Mutual allegedly mismanaged the investment and administration of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan in violation of ERISA, the federal law governing retirement plans. The company has agreed to settle these claims.
Do you qualify?
All participants and beneficiaries of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan from April 10, 2014 through December 31, 2025, excluding the defendants.
How to file
Former Participants must submit a Former Participant Claim Form postmarked or electronically filed by August 22, 2026 to receive their share. Current Participants do not need to take any action to participate in the settlement.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Scott Diehl
- Edward Lief
- Mark Severn
- Andrew Loring
- Mary Ann Stocum
- Yusuf Ahmed
Defendants
- James Kelleher
- John Does 1-40
- Christopher Peirce
- Melanie Foley
- Dennis Langwell
- Neeti Bhalla
- Mark Touhey
- Mark Kelleher
+ 3 more
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Troy A. DolesSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Ruben R. ChapaSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Nathan StumpSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Matthew E. LaydenSchlichter Bogard & Denton, LLP
- Alexander L. BraitbergSchlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP.
- Christopher C. NaumesThe Naumes Law Group, LLC
- Scott T. ApkingSchlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP
- Michael A, WolffSchlichter Bogard LLP
- Kurt C. StruckhoffSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Joel RohlfSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Jerome J. SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLC
- Andrew D. SchlichterSchlichter Bogard LLC
Counsel for defendants
- Nicole PachecoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Nicholle Patricia KnappSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Mark KelleherPRO SE
- Michael S. HinesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Mary Estelle GrinmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- James R. CarrollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Eben P. ColbySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Robinhood Order Flow Settlement
Robinhood allegedly routed customer market orders for equities in a manner that resulted in execution prices worse than the National Best Bid/Offer. Customers' buy orders were executed at prices higher than the best available offer, and sell orders were executed at prices lower than the best available bid. Robinhood denies all allegations of liability or wrongdoing.
Up to $17.60
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Surplus Proceeds Settlement
When 27 Michigan counties foreclosed on properties for tax nonpayment, they sold the properties at auction and kept the difference between the taxes owed and the sales proceeds. The lawsuit alleged that the counties violated property owners' rights by retaining these "surplus proceeds" without distributing them to the former owners.
Class members can generally recover 125 percent of their properties' surplus proceeds, minus any attorneys' fees and costs. This number is subject to certain potential adjustments.
Clackamas County Tax Foreclosure Settlement
Clackamas County allegedly failed to provide owners with proceeds from tax-foreclosed property sales that exceeded unpaid taxes and fees, or retained foreclosed properties worth more than the tax debt without compensation. The county denies wrongdoing and has settled to avoid costly litigation and address liability from the Supreme Court's Tyler v. Hennepin County decision.
Settlement Payments of "surplus proceeds"