Period Tracker Data Privacy Settlement (Flo, Google, Flurry)
Not stated
What happened
Between November 2016 and February 2019, the Flo period and ovulation tracker app allegedly incorporated code from third-party software development kits (from Flurry, Meta, and Google) through which user information related to menstruation and pregnancy was allegedly shared without proper legal authorization. Google agreed to pay $48 million, Flo agreed to pay $8 million, and Flurry agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle. All defendants deny wrongdoing and assert they did nothing wrong.
Do you qualify?
You are included if you used the Flo App in the United States between November 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019 and entered menstruation and/or pregnancy information into the app. California Subclass members must have also lived in California during that time. You must not have excluded yourself by July 20, 2025.
How to file
Complete and submit a Claim Form electronically by October 15, 2026 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time, or mail it postmarked no later than October 15, 2026. No specific documentation is mentioned as required.
In the news
- Meta loses landmark privacy trial over Flo App data sharingNaturalnews.com · August 7, 2025
- Meta illegally collected data from Flo period and pregnancy app, jury findsBiztoc.com · August 5, 2025
- Flo Period App Gets A Wrist Slap For Sharing Private Health DataTechdirt · January 21, 2021
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More privacy settlements
View all →WISP, Inc. Data Privacy Settlement
WISP, Inc. allegedly disclosed customers' personally identifiable information to third parties through Meta Pixel and other tracking technologies without consent, in violation of privacy laws including the Florida Security of Communications Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act. The defendant denies all claims and admits no wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.
Up to $18
Chattanooga Heart Institute Data Breach Settlement
Memorial Heart Institute experienced a cybersecurity incident between March 8 and March 16, 2023, that may have resulted in unauthorized access to or acquisition of individuals' private information including names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, health insurance information, and clinical records.
Dayton Airport Parking FACTA Settlement
SP Plus Corporation allegedly printed the expiration dates of credit cards and debit cards on electronically printed paper receipts at Dayton International Airport parking facilities. The settlement provides parking vouchers to affected customers.
Up to $23
TRISTAR Data Settlement
TRISTAR Insurance Group, Inc. experienced a data breach in November 2022 in which unauthorized access occurred to personally identifiable information of certain TRISTAR customers. TRISTAR denies all claims and wrongdoing; the settlement is not an admission of liability but rather resolves disputed claims.