Splish Splash Ticket Fee Settlement
Pro rata share based on the total amount of fees you paid
What happened
Festival Fun Parks, LLC d/b/a Palace Entertainment allegedly failed to properly disclose a processing fee for electronic tickets to its Splish Splash waterpark prior to those tickets being selected for purchase, in violation of New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law. The defendant denies wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses of continuing the case.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who purchased electronic tickets to Splish Splash waterpark and was charged a processing fee during the class period from August 29, 2022 through March 5, 2024.
How to file
Submit a timely and complete Claim Form online by 11:59 p.m. EST on August 10, 2026. Your payment will be a pro rata share of the $1,000,000 settlement fund based on the total amount of fees you paid.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Pricing Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products on its website. The defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims brought by consumers who purchased discounted mattresses.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries sold mattresses with fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the cover or be released if removed, causing economic harm and potential property or physical effects to consumers. The defendants deny all wrongdoing but are settling for judicial efficiency.
Pro rata share of $9 million voucher fund divided equally among all valid claims. Additional pro rata cash payment possible if attorneys' fees and costs awarded less than $3 million.
Cosequin® Dog Supplement Settlement
The defendants, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplement products in advertising and packaging. The defendants have agreed to pay $11.5 million to settle these claims without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Litigation Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to concerns about bonding separation and delamination that could cause breakage. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and inadequacy of the recall, seeking relief related to product advertising and marketing. The defendants deny any physical injuries resulted from the cranksets.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing and installing a replacement crankset, if applicable; otherwise automatic extended warranty coverage