Carter v Green Skyline Apartments Settlement
Allocated amount determined by dividing Net Settlement Fund by total eligible points (one point per month resided); individual payout is capped per Settlement Agreement.
What happened
Tenants sued Green Skyline Apartments, LLC in 2021 alleging breach of the warranty of habitability based on poor conditions in the lobby, elevators, hallways, stairwells, and common areas. The defendant has contested the claims but agreed to settle to avoid the time, expense, and inconvenience of litigation. The defendant admits no wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Settlement class members are individuals who resided in the Skyline Apartment building located at 753 James Street, Syracuse, New York 13203 for at least one month at any time from January 1, 2017 through July 14, 2023.
How to file
File a Claim Form by August 8, 2026. The Claims Administrator will determine each class member's payment based on the number of months they resided in the building, with each month equal to one point, then divide the net settlement fund by total eligible points to determine per-point value and calculate individual payouts.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Pricing Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products on its website. The defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims brought by consumers who purchased discounted mattresses.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries sold mattresses with fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the cover or be released if removed, causing economic harm and potential property or physical effects to consumers. The defendants deny all wrongdoing but are settling for judicial efficiency.
Pro rata share of $9 million voucher fund divided equally among all valid claims. Additional pro rata cash payment possible if attorneys' fees and costs awarded less than $3 million.
Cosequin® Dog Supplement Settlement
The defendants, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplement products in advertising and packaging. The defendants have agreed to pay $11.5 million to settle these claims without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Litigation Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to concerns about bonding separation and delamination that could cause breakage. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and inadequacy of the recall, seeking relief related to product advertising and marketing. The defendants deny any physical injuries resulted from the cranksets.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing and installing a replacement crankset, if applicable; otherwise automatic extended warranty coverage