Cannet v. Mai Kai Restaurant Settlement
Approximately $2.27 per hour worked, but could be less after deduction of attorneys' fees, costs, class representative service award, and administration expenses
What happened
Plaintiff alleged that Mai Kai Restaurant violated the Florida Minimum Wage Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act by committing wage violations against restaurant servers. The defendant denies wrongdoing, but agreed to settle to avoid the time, expense, and uncertainty of litigation.
Do you qualify?
All restaurant servers who worked at Mai Kai Restaurant and Polynesian Show in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, between November 15, 2024, and January 15, 2026. Collective action members must have also worked more than 40 hours in one or more workweeks during that period.
How to file
Submit a timely Claim Form online or by mail, postmarked no later than August 7, 2026. Submit through the website at maikaisettlement.com or contact the Settlement Administrator at ILYM Group, Inc., P.O. Box 2031, Tustin, CA 92781, or (888) 250-6810.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Novant Health Timeclock Rounding Collective Action Settlement
Novant Health allegedly used a timeclock rounding policy from September 2021 through February 2023 that caused hourly employees to lose overtime pay. Novant Health denies wrongdoing and asserts all employees were fully and properly paid. The parties settled the dispute to avoid trial costs and risks.
Your proportional share of the settlement calculated based on your length of employment in an hourly position during the class period (September 19, 2021 through February 11, 2023). Up to $403,730 total is available for employee payouts.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The lawsuit challenges whether the 80/20, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan was properly administered and terminated by the defendants in accordance with ERISA (federal retirement law). The defendants are accused of violations in how they handled the Plan's administration and termination. Defendants deny all claims and admit no wrongdoing.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
Job applicants sued The Seven Motor Corporation for failing to disclose wage scales or salary ranges in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Meathead Movers allegedly engaged in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) from at least 2017. The company has agreed to a settlement without admitting wrongdoing, providing up to $2 million to affected job applicants.
Up to $2 million total distributed to eligible applicants