Delong v. Glucobit Inc.
This case was recently filed and is being litigated — the claims below are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement, claim form, or payout yet. Watch the case (right) and we'll email you when it moves, including if it settles and a claim process opens.
What happened
A proposed class action filed against Glucobit Inc. under a contract theory of liability. The case involves allegations related to either the sale or performance of Glucobit's products or services, though specific details are not yet available in the docket entries.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Tuft & Needle Deceptive Pricing Settlement
Tuft & Needle allegedly deceptively advertised various discounts on mattress products on its website. The defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the claims brought by consumers who purchased discounted mattresses.
Up to $75
Todd v. Ashley Furniture Industries Mattress Fiberglass Settlement
Ashley Furniture Industries sold mattresses with fiberglass as a fire-retardant material in the inner sock covering. Plaintiffs allege the fiberglass can pass through the cover or be released if removed, causing economic harm and potential property or physical effects to consumers. The defendants deny all wrongdoing but are settling for judicial efficiency.
Pro rata share of $9 million voucher fund divided equally among all valid claims. Additional pro rata cash payment possible if attorneys' fees and costs awarded less than $3 million.
Cosequin® Dog Supplement Settlement
The defendants, Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc., allegedly misrepresented the benefits and effectiveness of certain canine Cosequin® supplement products in advertising and packaging. The defendants have agreed to pay $11.5 million to settle these claims without admitting wrongdoing.
$25–$150
Shimano Crankset Litigation Settlement
Shimano voluntarily recalled Hollowtech II cranksets manufactured before July 2019 due to concerns about bonding separation and delamination that could cause breakage. Plaintiffs alleged breaches of warranties and inadequacy of the recall, seeking relief related to product advertising and marketing. The defendants deny any physical injuries resulted from the cranksets.
Reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs for purchasing and installing a replacement crankset, if applicable; otherwise automatic extended warranty coverage