EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Discrimination Settlement
What happened
Since at least January 1, 2019, Kickback Jack's allegedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by having a policy or practice of intentionally failing to hire male applicants for nonmanagerial front-of-house positions because of their sex. Kickback Jack's denies any liability or wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Males who were denied a nonmanagerial front-of-house position at Kickback Jack's because of their sex. The EEOC will identify eligible claimants in its sole discretion.
How to file
Submit a claim form by August 3, 2026 with information and responses provided under oath and penalty of perjury. The EEOC will determine your eligibility and award amount based on the information you provide.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Novant Health Timeclock Rounding Collective Action Settlement
Novant Health allegedly used a timeclock rounding policy from September 2021 through February 2023 that caused hourly employees to lose overtime pay. Novant Health denies wrongdoing and asserts all employees were fully and properly paid. The parties settled the dispute to avoid trial costs and risks.
Your proportional share of the settlement calculated based on your length of employment in an hourly position during the class period (September 19, 2021 through February 11, 2023). Up to $403,730 total is available for employee payouts.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The lawsuit challenges whether the 80/20, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan was properly administered and terminated by the defendants in accordance with ERISA (federal retirement law). The defendants are accused of violations in how they handled the Plan's administration and termination. Defendants deny all claims and admit no wrongdoing.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
Job applicants sued The Seven Motor Corporation for failing to disclose wage scales or salary ranges in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Meathead Movers allegedly engaged in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) from at least 2017. The company has agreed to a settlement without admitting wrongdoing, providing up to $2 million to affected job applicants.
Up to $2 million total distributed to eligible applicants