Perry v. Alatrade Foods Settlement
Back pay consisting of 100% wages with standard payroll taxes withheld; actual amount depends on individual wage calculations.
What happened
Alatrade Foods is alleged to have violated the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act by terminating employees through a mass layoff or plant closing at its Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August 2025 without providing at least 60 days' advance notice. The defendant denies all allegations and liability.
Do you qualify?
All employees of Alatrade Foods who were terminated pursuant to a mass layoff or plant closing at the Phenix City, Alabama facility between February and August of 2025, as defined under the WARN Act.
How to file
Submit a valid and timely Claim Form on or before September 16, 2026 to participate in the settlement and receive a payment of back wages with standard payroll taxes withheld.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →Novant Health Timeclock Rounding Collective Action Settlement
Novant Health allegedly used a timeclock rounding policy from September 2021 through February 2023 that caused hourly employees to lose overtime pay. Novant Health denies wrongdoing and asserts all employees were fully and properly paid. The parties settled the dispute to avoid trial costs and risks.
Your proportional share of the settlement calculated based on your length of employment in an hourly position during the class period (September 19, 2021 through February 11, 2023). Up to $403,730 total is available for employee payouts.
80/20 ERISA Settlement
The lawsuit challenges whether the 80/20, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan was properly administered and terminated by the defendants in accordance with ERISA (federal retirement law). The defendants are accused of violations in how they handled the Plan's administration and termination. Defendants deny all claims and admit no wrongdoing.
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
Job applicants sued The Seven Motor Corporation for failing to disclose wage scales or salary ranges in job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
Meathead Movers allegedly engaged in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) from at least 2017. The company has agreed to a settlement without admitting wrongdoing, providing up to $2 million to affected job applicants.
Up to $2 million total distributed to eligible applicants