Ashley M. Crooks
Hausfeld LLP
- Address of record
- 33 Whitehall Street, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10004, 646-357-1100
- acrooks@hausfeld.com
- Phone
- (646) 357-1100
- Fax
- Fax 212-202-4322
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Cognizant and TriZetto Data Security Breach Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and TriZetto Provider Solutions, LLC experienced a data security breach. Based on the multidistrict litigation (MDL) designation and nature of suit coding, the case apparently involves claims by individuals whose personal information may have been compromised in the breach. The specific details of affected parties and data types are not available from the docket metadata provided.
- Filed
- June 5, 2026
- Represents
- Thereasa Ilene Harris Vaughn, Marion Barnett
Conduent Business Services Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Conduent Business Services experienced a data breach that compromised personal information of individuals. The lawsuit apparently concerns alleged failures to adequately protect sensitive data and alleged harm to class members whose information was exposed in the breach.
- Filed
- October 27, 2025
- Represents
- ANITA BURTON, DENNIS E. KWIATKOWSKI, RACHEL ANN ZAFRA, ADAM ROGERS
Columbia University Class Action
A proposed class action against Columbia University, apparently involving personal injury or other tort claims. The docket text does not specify the underlying allegations, but the case is brought by individual plaintiffs on behalf of a putative class. The court has not ruled on the merits.
- Filed
- August 21, 2025
- Represents
- Luke Linich, Jason Furtick
Columbia University Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Columbia University experienced a data breach affecting personal information of students, faculty, staff, or other individuals associated with the university. The case involves claims related to inadequate data security and the unauthorized access or exposure of sensitive personal data.
- Filed
- July 3, 2025
- Represents
- Joseph Quintero, Lauren Kramer, David Guirgis, Mary Thomas, Raymond Chao, Rema Khacho, Andrew Rudick, Carrick Reider, Randall Erwin, Nadav Margalit, Shakeem Holmes, Liam Murray, John McQueen, Steven Daley, Alex Hall, Gabriela Nadeau, Khamari Babb, Luke Linich
RetailMeNot Browser Extension Class Action
A proposed class action against RetailMeNot, apparently concerning its browser extension. The case, filed under the Other Fraud nature of suit, alleges deceptive or fraudulent practices related to the extension, but the available caption and docket text do not specify the exact claims. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- January 27, 2025
- Represents
- Motion Butter, LLC, ToastyBros, LLC, Brevard Marketing, LLC, Richard Young, TechSource Official, Tessa Rhodes, Just Josh, Inc.
Hot Topic Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Hot Topic, Inc. The docket entry indicates the court has consolidated several related cases against Hot Topic and appointed interim lead counsel, but does not describe the specific allegations. The nature-of-suit code suggests a personal injury claim, though no further details are available.
- Filed
- November 14, 2024
- Represents
- Daniel Garcia
Hot Topic Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action against Hot Topic, Robling, and Torrid, apparently concerning a data breach that exposed consumer information. The docket reflects that the court dismissed with leave to amend several claims, including invasion of privacy, California Consumer Privacy Act, California Consumer Records Act, Unfair Competition Law, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and unjust enrichment. The allegations are not proven facts and the case has not settled.
- Filed
- October 25, 2024
- Represents
- Alanna Roberson, Daniel Garcia
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.