CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 39 casesDefense counsel in 1 case

Carly M. Roman

Strauss Borrelli PLLC

Address of record
713 Pitman Street, Escondido, CA 92027, 773-946-9399
Email
croman@straussborrelli.com
Phone
(773) 946-9399
Fax
Fax (872) 263-1109

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

40
Cases tracked
39 active · 1 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
0
Cases with values
of 40 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Clark v. Centene Corporation

A proposed class action against Centene Corporation and Health Net LLC concerning an alleged contract dispute. The nature of suit is listed as "Contract: Other," though the specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entries provided, which contain only procedural orders regarding attorney admissions.

Filed
August 3, 2026
Represents
Howard Clark, Jr.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

ByzLoan TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against ByzLoan Corp. under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), filed by plaintiff Mathew Rogers. The complaint apparently alleges that ByzLoan Corp. engaged in prohibited telephone communications or calling practices affecting consumers. This is a newly filed case and the allegations have not yet been proven.

Filed
July 22, 2026
Represents
Mathew Rogers
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Acevedo v. DoctusUSA Inc. Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against DoctusUSA Inc. by plaintiff Mary Acevedo in federal court in Northern California. The complaint alleges unspecified claims under a general personal injury theory of suit (Nature of Suit code 360). Without access to the complaint's detailed allegations, the specific nature of the consumer grievance cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone.

Filed
July 17, 2026
Represents
Mary Acevedo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Arnet v. Catalyst Mortgage

A proposed class action has been filed against Catalyst Mortgage. Based on the case caption and finance-related nature of suit, the lawsuit apparently concerns mortgage lending practices or alleged wrongdoing by the defendant mortgage company, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.

Filed
July 8, 2026
Represents
Chris Arnet
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Taylor v. EarnIn Class Action

A proposed class action against EarnIn US1 LLC and Activehours, Inc., apparently concerning personal property or financial services. The case has been filed in federal court and defendants have requested an extension to respond to the plaintiff's class action complaint, suggesting this is an early-stage matter.

Filed
July 1, 2026
Represents
Vivian Taylor
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jazmine Herrera v. International Education Corporation

This putative class action alleges claims involving personal property against International Education Corporation. Based solely on the caption and nature of suit code, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, but the case appears to concern a dispute potentially affecting students or consumers of the defendant's educational services or related products.

Filed
June 5, 2026
Represents
Jazmine Herrera
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Asher Bronstin v. Fast Business Financial LLC TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Fast Business Financial LLC alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case involves allegedly unlawful telephone communications, and the court has granted plaintiff's motion to file a first amended class action complaint.

Filed
June 1, 2026
Represents
Asher Bronstin
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nakamura v. Pfizer Inc.

A proposed class action against pharmaceutical manufacturer Pfizer has been filed, apparently concerning a product or conduct affecting consumers or patients. The case has been consolidated with a related action (Myers v. Pfizer) filed shortly thereafter, suggesting common allegations affecting multiple individuals, though the specific claims cannot be determined from the available docket entries.

Filed
May 12, 2026
Represents
Terry Myers
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Renteria-Vera v. JC Resorts Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against JC Resorts LLC involving a personal property matter. Based on the limited docket information available, the specific allegations cannot be determined, though the case appears to concern potential consumer claims related to the resort operator's practices or obligations.

Filed
April 30, 2026
Represents
Rosemary Renteria-Vera
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Fongaro v. JRK Property Holdings Personal Property Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against JRK Property Holdings, Inc. concerning personal property matters. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and has been consolidated with related actions; the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entries provided, which only reflect procedural matters and scheduling orders.

Filed
April 21, 2026
Represents
Anthony Fongaro, Randall Gurvitz
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Discord TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Discord, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The complaint apparently concerns Discord's use of telephone or text-based communications, though specific details regarding the alleged TCPA violation are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
April 15, 2026
Represents
Justin Nelson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Castaneda v. Chime Financial Class Action

This proposed class action against Chime Financial, Inc., a financial services company, alleges claims related to personal property matters. Based on the nature of suit and defendant profile, the case likely concerns consumer financial practices, though specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information.

Filed
April 3, 2026
Represents
Cindy Castaneda, Lauren Goodloe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Cole v. Cash by Phone TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case was filed against Cash by Phone, LLC and appears to concern alleged unlawful telephone communications or practices regulated under the TCPA.

Filed
March 27, 2026
Represents
Virginia Cole
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Peterson v. Republic Services of Kentucky - TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) against Republic Services of Kentucky LLC. The lawsuit, apparently concerning unwanted telephone communications, was filed in federal court and seeks to represent a class of affected consumers who received such calls.

Filed
March 17, 2026
Represents
Keith Peterson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Wayne v. Telecare Corporation

This proposed class action alleges claims related to personal property matters against Telecare Corporation. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket information provided, though the nature of suit suggests potential consumer or customer-related claims.

Filed
February 26, 2026
Represents
Dennis Lee Wayne, Jr.
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Reames-Clevenger v. Mullinax Ford of Central Florida Class Action

A proposed class action against Mullinax Ford of Central Florida, Inc. concerning an alleged contract dispute. Based on the automotive defendant and contract nature of suit, the case apparently involves claims related to vehicle sales, financing, warranties, or related contractual obligations that may affect multiple consumers.

Filed
February 5, 2026
Represents
Myra Reames-Clevenger, Shirley Rohr
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Koeller v. TD Synnex Corporation TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that TD Synnex Corporation violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making unwanted telemarketing calls or text messages to consumers. The lawsuit involves claims arising under federal TCPA protections that regulate telemarketing communications.

Filed
February 4, 2026
Represents
Edward J. Koeller
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Escareno v. RPM Living Class Action

A proposed class action against RPM Living, LLC has been filed in federal court in San Diego. The nature of suit is listed as "Other Statutory Actions," but the caption and docket information provided do not disclose the specific allegations or the statutory basis for the claim. Additional docket entries would be needed to determine the nature of the dispute.

Filed
January 29, 2026
Represents
Joe Escareno, Justin Mansour
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Card v. TomoCredit TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action filed under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act alleges that TomoCredit, Inc. made unlawful telephone calls or text messages to consumers. The lawsuit appears to concern alleged TCPA violations, though specific details about the calls, messages, or relief sought are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
December 29, 2025
Represents
Shawn Card
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Quinstreet Inc. TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Quinstreet Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through allegedly unlawful telemarketing communications. The complaint appears to involve claims typical of TCPA violations, such as unwanted calls or texts to consumers' phones.

Filed
December 19, 2025
Represents
Julie Guiterrez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

McNamara v. Global Lending Services LLC TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Global Lending Services LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through its telephone practices. The case appears to involve claims related to unwanted calls or other TCPA-regulated telephone conduct allegedly affecting consumers.

Filed
December 16, 2025
Represents
Emily McNamara
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Almond v. The Federal Savings Bank TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act alleges that The Federal Savings Bank made unlawful automated calls or texts to consumers. The case was filed in federal court and appears to involve claims of improper telemarketing or debt-collection calls potentially affecting multiple consumers.

Filed
November 13, 2025
Represents
James Almond
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Silvis v. Bath Concepts Industries TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Bath Concepts Industries, LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through allegedly unlawful telephone calls or text messages. The case was filed in federal court and appears to seek remedies on behalf of consumers who received such communications.

Filed
October 24, 2025
Represents
Stephanie Silvis
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Women's HealthFirst TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleging that Women's HealthFirst, PLLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through allegedly unauthorized or non-compliant telephone communications. The lawsuit appears to involve claims related to telemarketing calls, text messages, or other telephonic contact that plaintiffs contend violated federal telecom regulations governing consumer contact.

Filed
October 22, 2025
Represents
Jayesh Godambe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ernest Hill v. Inland Empire Industrial Supplies - TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleging that Inland Empire Industrial Supplies, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through allegedly unlawful telephone communications. The complaint appears to involve claims concerning improper calls or text messages sent to consumers, which is a common basis for TCPA class actions seeking statutory damages on behalf of affected phone users.

Filed
September 10, 2025
Represents
Ernest Hill
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bachhuber v. Ooma Telephone Consumer Protection Act Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Ooma, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case was filed in federal court and involves claims that could affect consumers who use Ooma's telephone services or received communications related to its services.

Filed
September 3, 2025
Represents
Kevin Bachhuber
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Alameda Health System Contract Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Alameda Health System. The nature of suit is Contract: Other, suggesting claims related to contractual relationships, but the docket text does not provide specific factual allegations. The case was later voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Filed
August 8, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe, Jane Roe, Janet Doe, Janet Roe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ingram Micro Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Ingram Micro concerning an alleged data breach. The litigation appears to involve unauthorized access to personal information of individuals, with claims typical of data-breach and privacy-related consumer class actions.

Filed
July 10, 2025
Represents
Damond Brown, Charles Rodden, Edward Ndiba, Jane Doe, Bill Chism
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Allison v. United Wholesale Mortgage

A proposed class action filed against United Wholesale Mortgage concerning an alleged contract dispute. The nature of suit indicates a contractual claims matter, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.

Filed
June 26, 2025
Represents
Ethan Allison, Mark Caloca
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Allison v. PHH Mortgage Class Action

A proposed class action against PHH Mortgage alleging breach of contract. The case involves a dispute over mortgage-related contractual obligations, though specific allegations are not available from the docket entry provided.

Filed
June 25, 2025
Represents
Ethan Allison
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Lakeview Loan Servicing Contract Class Action

A proposed class action against Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, apparently concerning contract claims related to its mortgage loan servicing practices. The docket reflects a motion to dismiss and a hearing, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the available record.

Filed
June 16, 2025
Represents
Elijah Idris, Gowan McLin, Justin Bickham
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Weber Marking Systems Class Action

A proposed class action against Weber Marking Systems, Inc., apparently concerning claims related to personal property. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket, but the case was filed as a putative class action. These allegations are unproven and not yet a settlement.

Filed
May 29, 2025
Represents
Thomas Janisse
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Nationstar Mortgage Contract Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Nationstar Mortgage LLC, apparently involving a mortgage or loan contract dispute. The docket indicates the case was filed in the Northern District of California and later transferred to the Northern District of Texas. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available court records, but the case appears to concern claims by consumers under a mortgage contract.

Filed
May 23, 2025
Represents
Martin Beltran, Nicolle Ayers, Patrice Norwood
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jaime S. Schwartz MD PC Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Jaime S. Schwartz MD PC, apparently concerning fraud allegations. The case was filed in the Central District of California under the 'Other Fraud' nature of suit. The provided docket text only addresses attorney substitution and does not detail the specific factual allegations, which are not proven.

Filed
April 17, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PowerSchool Customer Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, apparently concerning a customer data security breach. The case is pending as multidistrict litigation, and the allegations likely relate to the companies' handling of customer personal information.

Filed
April 8, 2025
Represents
Robert Pettinger, Kylie Stowe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pacas TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Pacas, Inc. under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case apparently concerns allegations that Pacas, Inc. made unsolicited telemarketing calls or sent text messages in violation of the TCPA. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
March 18, 2025
Represents
Daniel Hlavac
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Schwartz MD PC Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Jaime S. Schwartz MD PC. The docket text provided does not describe the specific allegations, but the nature of suit (Personal Property: Other) and the plaintiff's use of a pseudonym suggest it may involve claims related to patient privacy or personal property. The allegations are not yet proven, and this is not yet a settlement.

Filed
March 13, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe
Defense counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

DeVry University TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against DeVry University, Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The docket indicates the nature of suit as TCPA, which often involves unsolicited robocalls, automated text messages, or do-not-call violations. These are allegations in a lawsuit, not proven facts, and the case has since been dismissed by stipulation.

Filed
February 19, 2025
Represents
Matthew Clemens
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jamie S. Schwartz Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action against Jamie S. Schwartz, apparently concerning personal injury claims. The docket does not provide additional details, but the nature of suit is 'P.I.: Other.' These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Filed
February 3, 2025
Represents
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, Jane Doe 9, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 11, Jane Doe 12, Jane Doe 13, Jane Doe 14, Jane Doe 15, Jane Doe 16, Jane Doe, Darlene Tuulik, Carla J. Utter, Christeen Johnson
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

The Gill Corporation Data Breach Settlement

The Gill Corporation experienced a cybersecurity incident on or about June 23, 2024, which was publicly disclosed in September 2024. Personal information of individuals was potentially compromised in this data breach. The Defendant denies the allegations and all liability but has agreed to settle to avoid the costs and risks of continued litigation.

Claim deadline
July 20, 2026
Represents
Adnan Ansar

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.