Christina Lee
Keker Van Nest and Peters LLP
- Address of record
- 633 Battery Street, San Francisco, CA 94111, (415) 391-5400
- clee@keker.com
- Phone
- (415) 391-5400
- Fax
- Fax (415) 397-7188
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Melunsky v. LinkedIn Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against LinkedIn Corporation in federal court. While the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case is classified under "Other Statutory Actions," suggesting claims that may involve user rights, data handling, or platform practices affecting LinkedIn users.
- Filed
- April 23, 2026
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
Arroyo v. Google LLC
This is a newly filed proposed class action against Google LLC in federal court in Northern California. The nature of suit is coded as "Other Statutory Actions," but the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information. Without access to the complaint, the precise claims cannot be determined.
- Filed
- December 16, 2025
- Represents
- Google LLC
Dialpad Class Action
This was a proposed class action against Dialpad, Inc. The docket text does not detail the specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit is 'P.I.: Other,' suggesting personal injury or other tort claims; these allegations are unproven. Dialpad moved to compel individual arbitration and to dismiss the complaint, and the plaintiff subsequently voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice.
- Filed
- May 28, 2025
- Represents
- Dialpad, Inc.
LinkedIn Contract Class Action
A proposed class action against LinkedIn Corporation has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, apparently concerning a contract dispute. The specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text provided. The docket entries reflect stipulations to extend time to respond to the complaint and to consolidate with other cases, as well as court hearings.
- Filed
- May 15, 2025
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
LinkedIn Privacy Class Action
A proposed class action against LinkedIn Corporation, apparently concerning personal injury or other claims brought by plaintiffs identified as Jane Doe and Cynthia Hays. The docket reflects a first amended consolidated class action complaint, but details of the alleged conduct are not available from the caption and docket entries; the use of pseudonymous plaintiffs suggests privacy-related allegations.
- Filed
- April 29, 2025
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
LinkedIn Class Action
This is a newly filed putative class action against LinkedIn Corporation. The case caption and docket metadata do not yet specify the underlying allegations, but the nature of suit 'Other Statutory Actions' often involves consumer- or privacy-related federal statutes. These are allegations only; no facts have been proven and there is no settlement.
- Filed
- February 3, 2025
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
LinkedIn Consumer Class Action
This is a proposed class action against LinkedIn Corporation, apparently concerning alleged violations of state law. The specific claims are not detailed in the docket text; these are allegations, not proven facts, and there is no settlement. The court granted LinkedIn's motion to compel arbitration, and the case is proceeding.
- Filed
- November 25, 2024
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
Spring Fertility Patient Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Spring Fertility Holdings, LLC, apparently concerning personal injuries or other harms related to fertility services. The plaintiff J.S., likely a patient, brings claims on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals. Specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text, but the nature of suit is 'P.I.: Other.'
- Filed
- October 22, 2024
- Represents
- LinkedIn Corporation
Twilio Class Action
A proposed class action against Twilio, Inc., apparently concerning personal injury or other tort claims. The court granted Twilio's motion to compel individual arbitration and stayed the case, and the parties later filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. The underlying allegations are described only at a high level in the docket and remain unproven.
- Filed
- June 21, 2024
- Represents
- Twilio, Inc.
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.