Cyril Vincent Smith , III
Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
- Address of record
- 100 East Pratt Street, Suite 2440, Baltimore, MD 21202, 410-949-1145
- csmith@zuckerman.com
- Phone
- (410) 949-1145
- Fax
- Fax 410-659-0436
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Under Armour Consumer Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Under Armour, Inc. in federal court. While specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case appears to involve consumer claims against the athletic apparel company. Further details regarding the nature of the claims would require access to the complaint itself.
- Filed
- November 24, 2025
- Represents
- David Freifeld, Steven Boyle
Kelly & Associates Insurance Group Insurance Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Kelly & Associates Insurance Group, Inc. The docket text does not include specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit is listed as 'P.I.: Other' (personal injury). The case is part of consolidated proceedings, and any allegations are unproven.
- Filed
- May 22, 2025
- Represents
- Mark Emery
Kelly Benefits Data Breach Class Action
A proposed class action against Kelly Benefits, apparently concerning a data breach affecting personal property. The litigation involves multiple plaintiffs and related cases that have been consolidated. The allegations concern a data breach, but these are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- April 22, 2025
- Represents
- Carolyn Gale, Cesar Mejia, Kimberly Rose, Chastan Law, Mark Emery
Lockheed Martin ERISA Class Action
A proposed class action against Lockheed Martin Corporation, apparently alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) concerning employee retirement or benefit plans. The docket indicates an amended complaint and an answer were filed, but the specific allegations are not detailed. These are allegations in a newly filed case and are not proven facts.
- Filed
- March 19, 2025
- Represents
- Karl Fezer, Vu-Timothy Nguyen, John Holmes, Steven Kay, Stewart Simon Million-Perez, Daniel Escamilla
ATI Inc. ERISA Class Action
A proposed class action against ATI Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) affecting employee benefit plans. The docket indicates the case was consolidated with a related action and interim class counsel was appointed. The allegations have not been proven.
- Filed
- August 23, 2024
- Represents
- JOHN SOUZA, KAREN SOUZA
ATI ERISA Class Action
A proposed class action against ATI, Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The nature of suit suggests claims related to employee benefit or retirement plans. Because only the caption and docket text are available, the precise alleged violations are unclear.
- Filed
- August 2, 2024
- Represents
- JOHN SOUZA, KAREN SOUZA
Local TV Advertising Settlement
Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.
- Settlement fund
- $48M
- Claim deadline
- October 26, 2023
- Represents
- Cellino & Barnes, P.C., One Source Heating & Cooling, LLC, Law Offices of Peter Miller, P.A., Walley's Auto Sales, Inc., Northtown Automotive Companies Inc., Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc., The Barnes Firm, L.C., Masseys Jewelers, Curb Appeal Madison LLC, LM SAC, LLC, Southern Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc., Dozier Law Firm LLC, Clay, Massey & Associates, P.C., Mowrer for Iowa, Kevin Forbes, Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, Fish Furniture
Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Settlement
Blue Cross Blue Shield companies allegedly violated antitrust laws by entering into an agreement not to compete with each other and to limit competition among themselves in selling health insurance and administrative services. The defendants deny wrongdoing and claim their conduct results in lower healthcare costs and greater access to care. The parties settled to avoid the risk and cost of further litigation.
- Settlement fund
- $2.7B
- Claim deadline
- November 5, 2021
- Represents
- Plaintiffs' Counsel
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.