David Peter Fuad
Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe LLP
- Address of record
- 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2700, Los Angeles, CA 90071, (213) 629-2020
- dfuad@orrick.com
- Phone
- (213) 629-2020
- Fax
- Fax (213) 612-2499
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Roblox Corporation Labor Standards Class Action
A proposed class action against Roblox Corporation under federal labor and fair standards law. Based on the nature of suit designation, the complaint appears to allege violations of wage, hour, or other employment standards. The case was filed in May 2026 and remains in early stages with defendant's counsel appearing and seeking extensions.
- Filed
- May 12, 2026
- Represents
- Roblox Corporation
French v. Roblox Corporation Product Liability Class Action
This proposed class action alleges personal injury or product liability claims against Roblox Corporation. The specific facts and allegations are not available from the provided docket metadata, but the nature of suit suggests the plaintiff contends that Roblox's platform, products, or services caused injury or harm.
- Filed
- September 16, 2025
- Represents
- ROBLOX CORPORATION
BMO Financial ERISA Class Action
A proposed class action against BMO Financial Corp., apparently concerning alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in connection with an employee benefit plan. The case was transferred from the Central District of California to the Northern District of Illinois, where motions to dismiss remain pending. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- November 6, 2024
- Represents
- BMO Financial Corp., Benefits Administration Committee of BMO Financial Corp.
Autotrader.com Privacy Class Action
This appears to be a proposed class action against Autotrader.com, Inc. concerning alleged violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, including California Penal Code §§ 631 and 638.51 (wiretapping and pen register/trap and trace provisions). The docket indicates the court dismissed the claims for lack of standing, with the § 631 claim dismissed with prejudice and the § 638.51 claim also dismissed with prejudice.
- Filed
- October 10, 2024
- Represents
- Autotrader.com, Inc.
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.