Ellen G. Jalkut
Robins Kaplan LLP
- Address of record
- 1325 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2601, New York, NY 10019, 212-980-7422
- Phone
- (212) 980-7422
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Green v. Vail Resorts Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against Vail Resorts, Inc. raising antitrust allegations. The complaint apparently concerns alleged anticompetitive conduct by the ski resort operator, potentially affecting consumers' ability to access ski pass services at competitive prices.
- Filed
- August 5, 2026
- Represents
- Nicholas Green, James Douglas, Joseph Goad
Archery Products Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that defendants engaged in anticompetitive conduct related to archery products, apparently involving price-fixing, market allocation, or other antitrust violations. The case has been designated as multidistrict litigation, suggesting multiple related claims have been consolidated in federal court in Colorado.
- Filed
- October 16, 2025
- Represents
- Michelle May
Fanatics Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against Fanatics, Inc. alleging antitrust violations. The complaint appears to concern allegedly anticompetitive conduct by the sports merchandise company, though specific details regarding the nature of the alleged restraint of trade or impact on consumers are not available from the docket information provided.
- Filed
- August 1, 2025
- Represents
- Mitchell Goldberger, Bruce Honnold
SAS Institute Extended Stay Hotel Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action apparently concerning antitrust and fraud allegations related to extended stay hotels. SAS Institute Inc. is identified in the docket as a party and has filed a motion to dismiss. The allegations are unproven and no settlement is indicated.
- Filed
- December 16, 2024
- Represents
- Regis Moeller, William Wachter
Local TV Advertising Settlement
Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.
- Settlement fund
- $48M
- Claim deadline
- October 26, 2023
- Represents
- Clay, Massey & Associates, P.C.
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.