Jamie Evan Shapiro
Tauler Smith LLP
- Address of record
- 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213-927-9270
- Phone
- (213) 927-9270
- Fax
- Fax 310-943-1455
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Teleflora Class Action - Lawrence Schallert
A proposed class action against Teleflora LLC filed in federal court in California. The nature of suit is listed as 'Other Statutory Actions,' but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket information provided. Further details would be needed to identify the precise claims and whether ordinary consumers or account holders could be class members.
- Filed
- June 9, 2026
- Represents
- Lawrence Schallert
Blalock v. FCA US Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against FCA US, LLC (Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge parent company) in federal court. The exact nature of the claims is not evident from the caption and docket information provided, though the automotive defendant suggests the lawsuit may concern vehicle-related consumer issues such as defects, performance problems, or related consumer protection claims.
- Filed
- January 27, 2026
- Represents
- Wendy Blalock
Mariela Alexandria Barajas v. Liveops, Inc.
A proposed class action against Liveops, Inc., apparently concerning employment-related claims. While the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the caption and nature of suit suggest this may involve wage-and-hour, misclassification, or other employment practice disputes affecting workers or independent contractors.
- Filed
- October 8, 2025
- Represents
- Mariela Alexandra Barajas
Foley Carrier Services Class Action
A proposed class action against Foley Carrier Services, LLC, apparently concerning claims under a federal statute (nature of suit 890). The docket does not detail the specific allegations, but the defendant appears to provide compliance or background screening services, so the case may involve consumer or employment background check issues. The plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice shortly after filing.
- Filed
- August 19, 2025
- Represents
- Jane Heiting
Dana Hughes v. GME Entertainment Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against GME Entertainment, LLC in federal court. While specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case involves claims arising under various statutory provisions. Additional details would be needed to characterize the precise nature of the consumer harm alleged.
- Filed
- August 14, 2025
- Represents
- Dana Hughes
Hibu Inc. Statutory Class Action
A proposed class action against Hibu Inc., apparently concerning statutory claims under the docket’s 'Other Statutory Actions' designation. The available docket text does not describe the underlying factual allegations, but the case was filed by an individual plaintiff and is treated as a putative class action.
- Filed
- August 1, 2025
- Represents
- Jane Heiting
Dana Hughes v. Sentry Insurance Company
A proposed class action against Sentry Insurance Company alleging unspecified claims under statutory authority. Without access to the complaint or docket entries, the specific nature of the allegations cannot be determined from the available information, though the matter appears to concern insurance practices that could affect consumers or account holders.
- Filed
- July 22, 2025
- Represents
- Dana Hughes
Atlassian US Class Action
A proposed class action was filed against Atlassian US, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The docket entries indicate the plaintiff filed an amended complaint and the court questioned subject matter jurisdiction, but the specific underlying allegations are not described in the available docket text. The lawsuit is categorized as an 'other statutory action.'
- Filed
- July 22, 2025
- Represents
- Dana Hughes
Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC Personal Injury Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC. The case is categorized as personal injury, suggesting allegations of harm, but specific details about the product or conduct are not available from the caption and docket text. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- December 3, 2024
- Represents
- Sarah Escobedo
Converse Class Action
A proposed class action against Converse, Inc., apparently concerning claims under other statutory laws. The docket entries show discovery disputes and a voluntary dismissal without prejudice by the plaintiff, but do not reveal the underlying allegations. The allegations are not proven facts.
- Filed
- September 20, 2024
- Represents
- Carol Price
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.