Michael C Dell'Angelo , IV
BERGER MONTAGUE PC
- Address of record
- 1818 Market Street, Suite 3600, Philadelphia, PA 19103, 215-875-3080
- mdellangelo@bm.net
- Phone
- (215) 875-3080
- Fax
- Fax 215-875-4604
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
C&L LLC v. Cal-Maine Foods Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action alleges that Cal-Maine Foods engaged in anticompetitive conduct in violation of antitrust law. The allegations apparently concern competition and pricing practices in the egg or poultry market. The case seeks to represent consumers or purchasers affected by the alleged anticompetitive behavior.
- Filed
- May 13, 2026
- Represents
- C&L, LLC, Den-Tex Central, Inc., Den-Tex Central II, Inc., ToWin 6840, LLC, ToWin 6966, LLC, ToWin 8583, LLC, ToWin 8872, LLC
Branded Beverage Antitrust Class Action
This proposed class action alleges that branded beverage manufacturers engaged in anticompetitive conduct. Based on the caption alone, the case appears to involve allegedly unlawful antitrust practices within the beverage industry that would affect consumers who purchased affected branded beverages.
- Filed
- August 5, 2025
- Represents
- Redner's Markets, Inc.
Bank of New York Mellon Negotiable Instrument Class Action
A proposed class action against The Bank of New York Mellon, apparently concerning negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code. The docket indicates multiple named plaintiffs; one plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his individual claims without prejudice, while the claims of the remaining named plaintiffs and the putative class remain pending. The nature of suit is 140 Negotiable Instrument, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the provided docket text.
- Filed
- March 13, 2025
- Represents
- Aaron Dobbs, Charles Flowers, Barry Williams
Shen Yun Performing Arts Labor Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Shen Yun Performing Arts, Inc. and related entities. Based on the nature of suit (Labor: Other), the case apparently concerns labor or employment practices. The allegations are not proven and the case is ongoing.
- Filed
- November 25, 2024
- Represents
- Chun-ko Chang
Valve Antitrust Class Action
A proposed class action against Valve Corporation, apparently alleging antitrust violations. The case has been consolidated with In re Valve Antitrust Litigation. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- October 24, 2024
- Represents
- Brandon Drake, Eric Saavedra
UBS Financial Services Contract Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against UBS Financial Services Inc. in federal court in New York. The docket classifies the case as a contract dispute, but the provided docket entries do not detail the specific allegations. The claims appear to concern contract-related issues involving the financial services company. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- September 3, 2024
- Represents
- Andrew Davitt
Charles Schwab Customer Account Class Action
A proposed class action against The Charles Schwab Corporation and affiliated TD Ameritrade entities. Based on the contract nature of suit, the case appears to concern customer brokerage or investment account agreements, possibly involving fees or account handling, though the available docket text does not detail the specific claims. The allegations are unproven and no settlement is indicated.
- Filed
- August 28, 2024
- Represents
- Mary Loughran, Rosemary Orlando, Edward Carr
JPMorgan Chase Contract Class Action
A proposed class action against JPMorgan Chase & Co. The nature of suit is listed as 'Contract: Other,' suggesting a contract-related dispute. The docket text provided does not include specific factual allegations, as it only contains transcript filing notices.
- Filed
- August 28, 2024
- Represents
- Kenneth Lopez
Raymond James Financial Contract Class Action
A proposed class action against Raymond James Financial, Inc., apparently concerning contract claims. The nature of suit is 'Contract: Other,' suggesting allegations related to contractual obligations, but specific details are not provided.
- Filed
- August 27, 2024
- Represents
- Raymond Schmidlin, Juliet Schmidlin
JPMorgan Chase Consumer Contract Class Action
A proposed class action against JPMorgan Chase & Co. appears to involve a contract dispute. The docket text does not provide specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit is 'Contract: Other,' and the defendant is a large bank, suggesting the case may concern consumer or account-holder contracts. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.
- Filed
- August 23, 2024
- Represents
- Dan Bodea, Richard W. Quigley Jr., Dan G. Bodea, Kenneth Lopez
UBS Financial Services Class Action
This is a proposed class action against UBS Financial Services Inc., apparently brought by account holders. The docket reflects a consolidated class action complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of fiduciary duty. An unjust enrichment claim was dismissed without prejudice, while the remaining contract and fiduciary duty claims were allowed to proceed at the motion to dismiss stage.
- Filed
- August 22, 2024
- Represents
- Andrew Davitt
Continental Resources Shale Oil Antitrust Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Continental Resources, Inc. and other shale oil producers, apparently alleging antitrust violations related to shale oil production or pricing. The case is part of multidistrict litigation, and the docket indicates that jurisdictional discovery is underway regarding the defendants' personal jurisdiction challenges.
- Filed
- August 15, 2024
- Represents
- Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Wells Fargo Cash Sweep Class Action
A proposed class action against Wells Fargo, apparently concerning its cash sweep program. The docket indicates a contract dispute, but specific allegations are not detailed in the available metadata.
- Filed
- July 30, 2024
- Represents
- Keith Bujold, Edward Nadolny, Darren Cobb
Ameriprise Financial Consumer Class Action
This appears to be a proposed class action against Ameriprise Financial, Inc., filed in the District of Minnesota. The docket lists the nature of suit as "Personal Property: Other" but provides no further detail about the specific allegations. Because the case was surfaced as a class-action complaint, it may involve consumer financial services or account holders, but the exact claims are unclear from the available metadata.
- Filed
- July 29, 2024
- Represents
- Mindy Bender
Morgan Stanley Account Contract Class Action
This is a proposed class action against Morgan Stanley, apparently concerning contract claims related to customer accounts. The case was brought by the estate of a deceased account holder, but the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata. The claims are allegations only and have not been proven.
- Filed
- June 14, 2024
- Represents
- Estate of Bernard J. Sherlip, The Barrett Living Trust
E*TRADE Cash Sweep Program Class Action
A proposed class action against E*TRADE Securities LLC, apparently concerning the E*TRADE and MSSB cash-sweep programs. The docket text indicates the putative class includes E*TRADE customers with cash deposits in those programs from February 1, 2018 to the present. Specific allegations are not detailed in the provided text, but the case appears to involve claims over how cash deposits in sweep accounts were handled.
- Filed
- February 1, 2024
- Represents
- THOMAS SIMMONS
Singularity Securities Settlement
Defendants allegedly misled shareholders about the benefits and value of various transactions, joint ventures, and business plans relating to Singularity's transformation from a global logistics company to a cryptocurrency mining and hardware development business. The defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing.
- Settlement fund
- $8.5M
- Claim deadline
- January 16, 2026
- Represents
- Ruibin Wang, Sen Gao, Luxiao Xu, Congli Huo
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.