Michael Dietz Roth
King & Spalding LLP
- Address of record
- 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, CA 90071, 213-218-4014
- mroth@kslaw.com
- Phone
- (213) 218-4014
- Fax
- Fax 213-443-4310
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Chosen Foods Class Action
This is a putative class action against Chosen Foods, LLC. The available docket text does not provide specific allegations, but the case appears to involve claims by consumers regarding the company's food products. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- October 7, 2026
- Represents
- Chosen Foods, LLC
Hartigan v. Nike Class Action
This putative class action was filed against Nike, Inc. in federal court in San Diego. Based on the docket information available, the specific allegations are not detailed in the caption or available docket entries, though the nature of suit code suggests a statutory claim potentially affecting consumers.
- Filed
- June 4, 2026
- Represents
- Nike, Inc.
Mitchell v. Skillz Platform Inc.
A proposed class action against Skillz Platform Inc. filed in federal court in Northern California. The case caption and nature of suit description do not provide specific allegations, so the underlying claims cannot be determined from the docket information available.
- Filed
- January 21, 2026
- Represents
- Skillz Platform Inc.
Magenheim v. Nike Consumer Class Action
This is a proposed class action filed against Nike, Inc. in federal court in South Florida. Based on the nature of suit coding for personal injury matters, the complaint apparently alleges some form of harm or defect related to Nike products, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket information provided.
- Filed
- December 16, 2025
- Represents
- Nike, Inc.
Miller v. The Gap Class Action
This putative class action, filed in the Northern District of California, names The Gap, Inc. as defendant. While specific allegations are not provided in the available docket information, the nature of suit designation (Personal Property: Other) suggests claims potentially involving product-related matters or consumer transactions. Additional details regarding the substantive allegations would require review of the complaint itself.
- Filed
- August 4, 2025
- Represents
- The Gap, Inc., Old Navy, LLC
Converse Class Action
A proposed class action against Converse, Inc., apparently concerning claims under other statutory laws. The docket entries show discovery disputes and a voluntary dismissal without prejudice by the plaintiff, but do not reveal the underlying allegations. The allegations are not proven facts.
- Filed
- September 20, 2024
- Represents
- Converse, Inc.
Spring EQ TCPA Class Action
A proposed class action against Spring EQ LLC, apparently concerning alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiff, Robert Mason, appears to claim that Spring EQ made unauthorized robocalls or sent unsolicited text messages, but specific details are not available from the docket. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- August 27, 2024
- Represents
- Spring EQ LLC
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.