CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 13 cases

Narain A. Kumar

Tauler Smith LLP

Address of record
626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 310-927-9270
Email
nkumar@taulersmith.com
Phone
(310) 927-9270
Fax
Fax 310-943-1455

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

13
Cases tracked
13 active · 0 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
0
Cases with values
of 13 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

CuriosityStream Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against CuriosityStream, Inc., apparently concerning alleged privacy violations related to its streaming service. The docket text does not describe the specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit as 'Other Statutory Actions' suggests claims under a federal statute, possibly involving privacy or consumer protection. The allegations are unproven, and the case was later dismissed with an appeal voluntarily dismissed.

Filed
February 12, 2025
Represents
Christopher Mitchener
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Royal Caribbean Cruise Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the Northern District of California. The docket entries do not specify the underlying allegations, but the case is categorized under 'Other Statutory Actions,' suggesting statutory claims involving the cruise line's operations. The court recently granted Royal Caribbean's motion to dismiss.

Filed
February 12, 2025
Represents
Kieren Kishnani
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Textron Personal Injury Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Textron Inc., apparently concerning alleged personal injuries. The available docket does not specify the exact product or conduct, but the plaintiff sought to represent a class. The court has granted Textron's motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint without leave to amend.

Filed
February 6, 2025
Represents
Dino Moody
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Alex and Ani Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action against Alex and Ani, LLC, a jewelry and accessories brand. The docket lists the nature of suit as 'Other Statutory Actions,' but the specific allegations are not stated. It appears to involve claims on behalf of consumers under a statute, but further details are unavailable.

Filed
January 27, 2025
Represents
Milan Hassid
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Rad Power Bikes Consumer Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Rad Power Bikes, Inc., apparently concerning allegations that the company's website used TikTok advertising and analytics tools such as the TikTok Pixel and advanced matching to track consumers' activity or share their information without consent. These allegations are not proven. The case was later dismissed without prejudice.

Filed
January 6, 2025
Represents
Robert Conohan
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Jo Malone Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Jo Malone, Inc. The complaint is docketed as an 'Other Statutory Actions' case, but the available docket text does not detail the specific statutory violations alleged. The docket indicates the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case with prejudice in February 2025.

Filed
December 4, 2024
Represents
Gurmit Deol
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC Personal Injury Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC. The case is categorized as personal injury, suggesting allegations of harm, but specific details about the product or conduct are not available from the caption and docket text. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts.

Filed
December 3, 2024
Represents
Sarah Escobedo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

BB OpCo Class Action

This is a putative class action against BB OpCo, LLC, filed under 'Other Statutory Actions.' The provided docket text does not detail the underlying allegations, but it reflects that the named plaintiff reported a settlement, after which the court dismissed the individual claims and dismissed the class allegations without prejudice. The specific factual claims cannot be summarized from the available information.

Filed
November 7, 2024
Represents
Kieren Kishnani
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

AARP Class Action

A proposed class action against AARP was filed, apparently concerning claims under a federal statute (Nature of Suit 890). The docket text does not detail the specific allegations, but the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case, initially without prejudice and later with prejudice. These are allegations only, and no court has made findings.

Filed
November 7, 2024
Represents
Clark Santoro
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Viome Life Sciences Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Viome Life Sciences, Inc. The case is docketed as an 'Other Statutory Actions' matter, which often involves consumer protection or similar statutory claims. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket entries, but the suit appears to relate to products or services Viome offers to individuals.

Filed
November 7, 2024
Represents
Anne Heiting
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

MGID Consumer Class Action

This is a proposed class action against MGID Inc. The available docket text does not detail the specific allegations, but the case was filed under the 'Other Statutory Actions' nature-of-suit category. It was later dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution after the plaintiff did not respond to an order to show cause.

Filed
November 4, 2024
Represents
Nicolette Ocampo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

PUMA North America Consumer Class Action

This appears to be a proposed class action against PUMA North America, Inc. The docket indicates the case was filed under 'Other Statutory Actions,' suggesting possible consumer-protection or statutory claims regarding PUMA's products or practices. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket text, and these are allegations only, not proven facts.

Filed
November 1, 2024
Represents
Travis Rounds
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Shop Ma Consumer Class Action

A newly filed putative class action against Shop Ma, Inc., brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the court's 'Other Statutory Actions' nature of suit. The docket text provided does not include the specific allegations, so the exact statutory claims and underlying conduct are not detailed. The case appears to involve claims on behalf of a class of consumers or other individuals, but further information is needed.

Filed
October 31, 2024
Represents
Dino Moody

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.