CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 4 cases

Nayeem N. Mohammed

Law Office of Nayeem N. Mohammed

Address of record
539 W. Commerce St., Ste 1899, Dallas, TX 75208, 972-767-9099
Email
nayeem@nnmpc.com
Phone
(972) 767-9099

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

4
Cases tracked
4 active · 0 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
0
Cases with values
of 4 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bradford v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

A proposed class action against Pentagon Federal Credit Union concerning consumer credit matters. The nature of suit code (480) suggests allegations related to consumer credit practices, though specific details are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
January 2, 2026
Represents
Radley Bradford
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bradford v. Matrix Medical Network TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Matrix Medical Network, LLC alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit apparently concerns allegedly unlawful telephone communications, which TCPA cases typically involve unwanted calls, texts, or use of automated dialing systems without proper consent.

Filed
August 29, 2025
Represents
Radley Bradford
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Verde Energy TCPA Class Action

This is a proposed class action filed against Verde Energy USA, Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The filing suggests claims that the company made unlawful telemarketing calls or texts. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Filed
December 31, 2024
Represents
Krystina R. Fitzgerald
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pentagon Federal Credit Union TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Pentagon Federal Credit Union, apparently alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The docket reflects the case was dismissed with prejudice as to the individual plaintiff's claims and without prejudice as to prospective class members after a notice of settlement.

Filed
December 30, 2024
Represents
Mark A. Cuellar

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.