CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 8 cases

Ruhandy Glezakos

Treehouse Law, LLP

Address of record
3130 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 555, Santa Monica, CA 90403, 310-751-5948
Email
rglezakos@treehouselaw.com
Phone
(310) 751-5948

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

8
Cases tracked
8 active · 0 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
0
Cases with values
of 8 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Eleeo Brands Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Eleeo Brands alleging fraud. Based on the nature of suit designation, the complaint apparently involves allegations of fraudulent conduct, though specific details regarding the nature of the fraud, affected products or services, and the basis for class allegations are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
April 1, 2026
Represents
Makayla McCanless
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Chiplinsky v. Kao USA Inc.

A proposed class action has been filed against Kao USA Inc., a consumer products company. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone, though the nature of suit code suggests a consumer-protection or product-related claim.

Filed
March 27, 2026
Represents
Kate Chiplinsky
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Flawless Naturals Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Flawless Naturals, LLC by Brittany Stupar concerning personal property matters. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, though the nature of suit code suggests a consumer product-related dispute.

Filed
January 13, 2026
Represents
Brittany Stupar
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Traditional Medicinals Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Traditional Medicinals, Inc. alleging fraud. Based on the case caption and nature of suit coding, the lawsuit apparently concerns allegedly deceptive or fraudulent claims or practices related to the defendant's products, though specific details are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
September 16, 2025
Represents
Porsche Desrys
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Oakberry Acai Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Oakberry Acai Inc. committed fraud in connection with its acai products or business practices. The complaint appears to involve consumer claims under California law, though specific details regarding the nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
August 5, 2025
Represents
Yolanda Jean Pitre
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Revlon Consumer Products Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Revlon Consumer Products engaged in fraud concerning its consumer products. The complaint was filed in the Central District of California in July 2025, apparently concerning allegations that ordinary consumers were deceived in connection with Revlon's product marketing, labeling, or sale.

Filed
July 30, 2025
Represents
Robin Victoria Savage
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Hollywood Park Management Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Hollywood Park Management Company, LLC, apparently concerning fraud. The case was removed from Los Angeles County Superior Court to federal court, and the court later granted plaintiff's motion to remand. The allegations in the complaint have not been proven.

Filed
November 22, 2024
Represents
Nensi Stagnaro
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Costco Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Costco Wholesale Corporation, apparently alleging fraud involving items sold by Costco. The complaint alleged there were thousands of proposed class members and that the aggregate amount in controversy exceeded $5 million. The court questioned whether the amount-in-controversy requirement was met, and the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case.

Filed
November 18, 2024
Represents
Donna Costan

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.