Scott Robert Drury
Drury Legal, LLC
- Address of record
- 6 Carriage Lane, Highwood, IL 60040, 312-358-8225
- scott@drurylegal.com
- Phone
- (312) 358-8225
- Fax
- Fax Active
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Melunsky v. LinkedIn Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against LinkedIn Corporation in federal court. While the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, the case is classified under "Other Statutory Actions," suggesting claims that may involve user rights, data handling, or platform practices affecting LinkedIn users.
- Filed
- April 23, 2026
- Represents
- Clarissa Melunsky, Dana Cutolo, Kate Shimshock, Maureen Carey, Can Ozdoruk, Shubhranshu Gupta
Farrell v. LinkedIn Corporation
A proposed class action against LinkedIn Corporation filed in federal court. Based on the nature of suit designation for personal injury/other matters, this case apparently concerns alleged harm to users or account holders, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.
- Filed
- April 6, 2026
- Represents
- Nicholas Farrell
Doe 1 v. Grow Care, Inc.
A proposed class action has been filed against Grow Care, Inc. in federal court in South Dakota (New York). The case is classified as a personal injury matter, but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the limited docket information available.
- Filed
- March 9, 2026
- Represents
- Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2
Plushcare Patient Data Security Class Action
A proposed class action filed against Plushcare, Inc., apparently concerning alleged privacy or data security violations affecting patients or users of the telehealth platform. The case involves a personal injury category (nature of suit code 360) but the specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information.
- Filed
- November 24, 2025
- Represents
- Robert Perkins
University of Phoenix Video Privacy Class Action
A proposed class action against The University of Phoenix, Inc., apparently alleging that the university disclosed users' video-viewing information to third parties such as Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, and Amazon in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act. Those are allegations in a pending case, not proven facts and not a settlement. The court recently granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss, allowing certain VPPA claims to proceed while dismissing others.
- Filed
- April 1, 2025
- Represents
- Janielle Dawson
National University Class Action
This is a newly filed proposed class action against National University. The docket text does not include the complaint's specific allegations, but the case is designated as an 'Other Statutory Actions' matter and involves arbitration-related discovery. The allegations have not been proven, and no settlement is indicated.
- Filed
- April 1, 2025
- Represents
- Janielle Dawson
LinkedIn Class Action
This is a newly filed putative class action against LinkedIn Corporation. The case caption and docket metadata do not yet specify the underlying allegations, but the nature of suit 'Other Statutory Actions' often involves consumer- or privacy-related federal statutes. These are allegations only; no facts have been proven and there is no settlement.
- Filed
- February 3, 2025
- Represents
- Courtney Cole
Grow Care Personal Injury Class Action
A proposed class action against Grow Care, Inc., apparently concerning personal injury or other tort claims. The available docket text does not describe specific factual allegations, only procedural motion-to-dismiss briefing. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- December 17, 2024
- Represents
- Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2
Inito, Inc. Class Action
A proposed class action was filed against Inito, Inc., apparently concerning personal injury or other harm, as indicated by the nature of suit (P.I.: Other). The caption and docket text do not describe the specific allegations, and any allegations are not proven. The docket reflects procedural matters, including a voluntary dismissal with prejudice by the plaintiff.
- Filed
- November 25, 2024
- Represents
- Jane Doe
Call-On-Doc Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Call-On-Doc, Inc., apparently a telehealth provider. The plaintiff is identified only as 'Doe,' and the docket text does not detail the specific allegations beyond the nature of suit 'P.I.: Other.' These are allegations only, not proven facts.
- Filed
- November 7, 2024
- Represents
- Jane Doe, Charlie Lucas
Phillip Morris Tobacco Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action against Phillip Morris International Inc. was filed in federal court in Connecticut. The case is categorized as 'Other Fraud' and appears to concern allegations of fraudulent conduct by the tobacco company. The specific claims are not detailed in the docket text available.
- Filed
- July 30, 2024
- Represents
- Ethan Norris
Instant Urgent Care Class Action
A proposed class action against Instant Urgent Care, apparently concerning personal injury claims. The docket does not provide further details, so the specific allegations are unclear.
- Filed
- June 27, 2024
- Represents
- Tim Harvey
Twilio Class Action
A proposed class action against Twilio, Inc., apparently concerning personal injury or other tort claims. The court granted Twilio's motion to compel individual arbitration and stayed the case, and the parties later filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. The underlying allegations are described only at a high level in the docket and remain unproven.
- Filed
- June 21, 2024
- Represents
- Jonathon Perry-Hudson
Martinez v. Choose Your Horizon - Privacy Data Disclosure Settlement
Choose Your Horizon, Inc., a ketamine therapy provider, allegedly disclosed customers' confidential and protected health information to third parties in violation of California privacy law through its websites. The defendant denies liability but agreed to settle to avoid further legal costs and uncertainty.
- Settlement fund
- $400,000
- Claim deadline
- April 23, 2026
- Represents
- Karen Martinez
Joyous PBC Ketamine Therapy Privacy Settlement
Joyous, PBC, a ketamine therapy provider, allegedly disclosed customers' confidential information to third parties in violation of California privacy law. Joyous denies liability but settled the case to avoid additional legal fees and litigation uncertainty.
- Settlement fund
- $400,000
- Claim deadline
- November 24, 2025
- Represents
- Jane Doe
PowerSchool/Naviance Student Data Interception Settlement
PowerSchool, Hobsons, Heap, and Chicago Public Schools allegedly non-consensually intercepted students' confidential and sensitive communications while they used the Naviance education technology platform. The defendants allegedly violated privacy laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act, Illinois Eavesdropping Act, and Stored Communications Act. Defendants deny wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid litigation costs and uncertainties.
- Settlement fund
- $17.3M
- Claim deadline
- July 27, 2026
- Represents
- Q.J.
T-Mobile 2021 Data Breach Settlement
T-Mobile suffered a cyber-attack in August 2021 that exposed the personal information of more than 76 million customers, including full names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and drivers' license information of current, former, and prospective customers. T-Mobile agreed to pay $350 million to compensate class members and invest an additional $150 million in data security improvements.
- Settlement fund
- $350M
- Claim deadline
- January 23, 2023
- Represents
- Valerie Rogoff
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.