CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 3 cases

Steven Noel Williams

Address of record
Steven Williams Law - San Francisco, Ste. 1100, 201 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA 10005, 415-260-7909
Email
swilliams@stevenwilliamslaw.com
Phone
(415) 260-7909

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

4
Cases tracked
2 active · 2 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 4 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Michelin Passenger Vehicle Replacement Tires Antitrust Class Action

This multidistrict litigation involves a proposed class action against manufacturers of passenger vehicle replacement tires, including Michelin, alleging violations of antitrust laws. The docket entries indicate that plaintiffs are seeking leave to file amended complaints, suggesting ongoing litigation over claims that the defendants engaged in anticompetitive conduct affecting purchasers of replacement tires. These are allegations only, not proven facts.

Filed
August 9, 2024
Represents
DPP Interim Co-Lead Counsel, DPP Liaison Counsel, EPP Interim Co-Lead Counsel, EPP Liaison Counsel, ADP Interim Co-Lead Cousel
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bridgestone Tire Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Bridgestone Corporation, apparently concerning antitrust violations. The case was transferred to the Northern District of Ohio by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff shortly after. The specific allegations are not detailed in the docket text, but the nature of suit is Anti-Trust.

Filed
June 20, 2024
Represents
Cheresse Benton
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Orange County Oil Spill Settlement

Amplify Energy Corporation allegedly caused an oil spill in Orange County. The company is paying to settle claims related to the spill.

Claim deadline
Represents
Ketcham Tackle LLC
CounselSettled — claims closed

Local TV Advertising Settlement

Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.

Settlement fund
$48M
Claim deadline
October 26, 2023
Represents
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.