CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 2 cases

Tyler J. Story

Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP

Address of record
311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5450, Chicago, IL 60606, 312-346-2222
Email
tjs@wbe-llp.com
Phone
(312) 346-2222
Fax
Fax 312-346-0022

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

4
Cases tracked
3 active · 1 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 4 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Rivera v. Levy Premium Foodservice Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Levy Premium Foodservice Limited Partnership. Based on the nature of suit and parties involved, the case appears to concern either food safety/quality issues affecting consumers or employment-related claims affecting workers. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone.

Filed
July 18, 2025
Represents
Sergio Rivera, Riley Nelson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Meta Platforms Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action against Meta Platforms, Inc., apparently concerning antitrust or anticompetitive conduct under federal law. The docket text does not include substantive allegations, but the case is docketed as an antitrust matter. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.

Filed
November 18, 2024
Represents
John Luis Bracamontes, Ronald Williams
CounselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Tecfidera Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action was filed in the Northern District of Illinois concerning Tecfidera, a drug used to treat multiple sclerosis. The case is docketed as an antitrust matter, suggesting allegations of anticompetitive conduct related to Tecfidera, though the specific claims are not detailed in the available docket text. These are allegations in a newly filed case and have not been proven.

Filed
August 16, 2024
Represents
Service List
CounselSettled — claims closed

Local TV Advertising Settlement

Plaintiffs claimed that broadcaster defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the price levels of broadcast television spot advertising, and that sales rep firms and other entities facilitated communication between them. As a result, plaintiffs allegedly paid artificially inflated prices. The settling defendants deny all wrongdoing but have agreed to settle to avoid the cost and inconvenience of further litigation.

Settlement fund
$48M
Claim deadline
October 26, 2023
Represents
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.