CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 8 cases

Walter M Smith

SMITH & DIETRICH LAW OFFICES PLLC

Address of record
1226 STATE AVE NE, STE 205, OLYMPIA, WA 98506, 360-915-6952
Email
walter@smithdietrich.com
Phone
(360) 915-6952

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

8
Cases tracked
8 active · 0 settled
—
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
0
Cases with values
of 8 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Hutton v. Papa John's USA Inc.

A proposed class action against Papa John's USA Inc. concerning allegations related to the company's practices or offerings. While specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information, the case appears to involve claims that could affect ordinary consumers or account holders of the restaurant chain.

Filed
October 3, 2025
Represents
Colby Hutton
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Skechers USA Data Breach or Fraud Class Action

This proposed class action against Skechers USA Inc. alleges fraud under nature of suit code 370. While specific details are not available from the docket entry, the complaint likely involves either consumer data practices, product-related fraud, or privacy concerns affecting ordinary Skechers customers or account holders. The case was filed in September 2025 and remains in early stages.

Filed
September 22, 2025
Represents
Stephen Liss, Boni Melchor
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Devivo v. Sheex Inc. Class Action

A proposed class action against Sheex Inc., apparently concerning consumer products or services. The limited docket information available does not specify the precise allegations, but the case is filed under a general "Other Statutory Actions" designation in federal district court.

Filed
September 10, 2025
Represents
Andrew Devivo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc Class Action

This proposed class action against Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc alleges unspecified claims arising under statute, filed in federal district court. Without access to the complaint text, the precise nature of the allegations cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone.

Filed
August 1, 2025
Represents
Selay Shahpur, Lindsey Smith
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ma v. Nike Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Nike Inc. in federal court in Washington. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case appears to concern consumer-related claims under a statutory cause of action.

Filed
July 1, 2025
Represents
Harrison Ma
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Exp Realty Class Action

A proposed class action against Exp Realty LLC and Aaron Yoon. The docket indicates the case is proceeding with class certification discovery and motion practice, but it does not state the specific underlying claims. Based on the nature-of-suit code for other statutory actions and the real estate context, the case may involve consumer-protection or telecommunications statutes, though the allegations are unproven.

Filed
May 5, 2025
Represents
Daniel Hollis
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Dentegra Insurance Class Action

This is a proposed class action against Dentegra Insurance Company. The limited docket metadata indicates a claim categorized as personal property other, but no specific allegations are available. It appears to involve insurance-related claims brought on behalf of consumers or policyholders.

Filed
July 9, 2024
Represents
Jeffrey Ehli
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Dentegra Insurance Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Dentegra Insurance Company, apparently concerning a data security breach involving the MOVEit file transfer software. The case was transferred to the District of Massachusetts as part of MDL 3083, In re MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation. The allegations, which are not yet proven, appear to claim that customer personal information was exposed due to the defendant's data security failures.

Filed
May 31, 2024
Represents
Jeffrey Ehli

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.