Wesley Michael Griffith
Almeida Law Group LLC
- Address of record
- 111 W. Ocean Blvd, Suite 426, Long Beach, CA 90802, 310-896-5813
- Phone
- (310) 896-5813
Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.
Case history
Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.
Murphy v. Domino's Pizza Franchising Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Domino's Pizza Franchising LLC in federal court. Based on the available docket information, the nature of the complaint is not yet clear from the caption alone, though it appears to involve a statutory claim under a category designated as 'Other Statutory Actions.' Additional details about the specific allegations would require access to the complaint document itself.
- Filed
- February 26, 2026
- Represents
- John Murphy
Johnston v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
A proposed class action against Costco Wholesale Corporation alleging fraud under federal law. The complaint, filed in January 2026, apparently concerns conduct affecting ordinary Costco customers or members, though specific details of the alleged fraud are not provided in the available docket information.
- Filed
- January 22, 2026
- Represents
- Bianca Johnston, Anatasia Chernov
Criswell v. FanDuel Class Action
A proposed class action against FanDuel, Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations under an unspecified statute. The nature of suit code (890 Other Statutory Actions) suggests claims involving consumer protection or regulatory law, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone. This appears to be a newly filed case with limited docket information currently available.
- Filed
- December 5, 2025
- Represents
- Gilbert Criswell
Rahmani v. Thrillzz Inc. Fraud Class Action
A proposed class action has been filed against Thrillzz Inc. alleging fraud. Based on the nature of suit code, the complaint apparently involves allegations of fraudulent conduct, though specific details are not available from the limited docket information provided. This is a newly filed case and the allegations have not been proven.
- Filed
- September 26, 2025
- Represents
- Jared Rahmani, Gurgen Galstyan
Skullcandy Civil Rights Class Action
A proposed class action against Skullcandy, Inc., apparently concerning alleged civil rights violations. The docket reflects that Skullcandy moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, lack of standing, lack of personal jurisdiction, and improper venue, and the court denied that motion. These are allegations in a newly filed case, not proven facts and not yet a settlement.
- Filed
- July 9, 2025
- Represents
- Julie Jones
FanDuel Sports Betting Consumer Class Action
This proposed class action against FanDuel, Inc. appears to involve consumer claims related to the company's sports betting operations. Based solely on the case caption and nature of suit coding, the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, but the case suggests potential consumer protection issues arising from FanDuel's business practices.
- Filed
- July 2, 2025
- Represents
- Martin Beltran
Underdog Fantasy Sports Class Action
A proposed class action against Underdog Sports, LLC, which operates the Underdog Fantasy sports platform. The complaint, identified as Head v. Underdog Sports, apparently concerns practices or conduct related to the fantasy sports service, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket information provided. This newly filed case seeks to represent a class of consumers who used or were affected by the platform.
- Filed
- July 1, 2025
- Represents
- O'Sean Head
SidePrize Class Action
A proposed class action against SidePrize LLC, apparently concerning alleged violations of a federal statute (nature of suit 890 Other Statutory Actions). The lawsuit alleges that the company's conduct harmed ordinary consumers, though specific claims are not detailed in the available docket text.
- Filed
- June 11, 2025
- Represents
- Justin Franks, Jack Bacigalupi
DraftKings Class Action
This is a proposed class action against DraftKings, Inc., apparently concerning alleged violations of federal law. The available docket entries do not describe the specific claims. The allegations have not been proven.
- Filed
- June 1, 2025
- Represents
- Brandon Moore, Zhicheng Zhen, Jonathan Smith
“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.