CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 6 cases

Wilson Daniel Miles , III

Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.

Address of record
218 Commerce Street, Building 272, Montgomery, AL 36104, (334)-269-2343
Email
dee.miles@beasleyallen.com
Phone
(334) 269-2343
Fax
Fax (334)-954-7555

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

6
Cases tracked
4 active · 2 settled
$2.8B
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
2
Cases with values
of 6 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Doe v. X.AI Corp.

A proposed class action has been filed against X.AI Corp. and related entities by multiple plaintiffs using pseudonyms (John Doe I and Jane Does). The nature of suit code suggests statutory claims, and the use of anonymized plaintiff names indicates the case may involve sensitive personal matters such as privacy violations, data breaches, or similar concerns affecting ordinary individuals.

Filed
August 18, 2026
Represents
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, John Doe I, Jane Doe III, Jane Doe IV, Jane Doe V
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Maczko v. ARB Gaming Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against ARB Gaming, LLC alleging fraud. The complaint was filed by Peter Maczko in federal district court in Minnesota, though the specific details of the alleged fraudulent conduct are not disclosed in the available docket entries.

Filed
July 23, 2026
Represents
Peter Maczko
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Kalshi Sports Prediction Market Class Action

A proposed class action alleges violations related to Kalshi's sports prediction market operations. The case involves ordinary users who participated in the platform, apparently raising concerns about regulatory compliance or unfair trading practices in the prediction market context.

Filed
October 16, 2025
Represents
Det. Christopher Jennings
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Yardi Systems Antitrust Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Yardi Systems Inc, apparently concerning antitrust violations. The case has been consolidated with related actions against Yardi Systems and other defendants, including KRE Group Inc. The lawsuit appears to involve claims under federal antitrust law that could affect ordinary consumers.

Filed
November 25, 2024
Represents
Madison Shewmaker, Jamaar Faison, Cynthia Beevers
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

GM Engine Litigation Settlement

General Motors sold 2011-2014 Chevrolet and GMC pickup trucks and SUVs with LC9 5.3-liter V8 engines that allegedly contain a defective piston assembly. The defect causes excessive engine wear, oil consumption, spark plug fouling, rough idling, check engine lights, and potential engine damage. GM denies any wrongdoing or that the vehicles are defective.

Settlement fund
$150M
Claim deadline
Represents
Gabriel Del Valle, Larry Goodwin, Jill Cralley, William Davis, Jr., Monteville Sloan, Jr., Raul Siqueiros, Joseph Brannan, Donald Ludington, Thomas Shorter, Gail Lannom, Bradley K. Zierke, Ross Dahl, Drew Peterson, Barbara Molina, Steven Ehrke, Bill Mauch, Thomas Gulling, Ronald Jones, John Graziano, Rudy Sanchez, Mike Warpinski, Marc Perkins, Joseph Olivier, Christopher Thacker, Derick Bradford, James Robertson, Joshua Byrge, Randy Clausen, Steve Kitchen, Ted Edgecomb, Kevin Hanneken, Michael Ware, Scott Smith, Jonas Bednarek, John Neubauer, James Faulkner, Dan Madson, Katelyn Doepel, Todd Cralley, Dennis Vita, Edwin Doepel, Kelly Harris, William Martell, John Knoll
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Settlement

Blue Cross Blue Shield companies allegedly violated antitrust laws by entering into an agreement not to compete with each other and to limit competition among themselves in selling health insurance and administrative services. The defendants deny wrongdoing and claim their conduct results in lower healthcare costs and greater access to care. The parties settled to avoid the risk and cost of further litigation.

Settlement fund
$2.7B
Claim deadline
November 5, 2021
Represents
Plaintiffs' Counsel

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.