CVS Eyedrops Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 18, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
CVS sold store brand over-the-counter eyedrop products that were subject to a recall after FDA investigators found unsanitary conditions in an Indian manufacturing facility. The plaintiff alleges the products were defective, though CVS denies any wrongdoing and the court has not determined liability. The parties agreed to settle the dispute.
Do you qualify?
Anyone in the United States who purchased CVS store brand over-the-counter eyedrops between October 1, 2021, and October 25, 2023.
How to file
Submit a claim form by September 18, 2025, choosing between two claim options. Go to the "File a Claim" tab on the website. If approved, you will receive payment by check or electronic payment.
Common questions
- What is the claim deadline for the CVS Eyedrops Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was September 18, 2025. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the CVS Eyedrops Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at cvseyedropsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the CVS Eyedrops Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for October 28, 2025; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
In the news
- CVS Settles for $18.2M Over California False Claims Act ViolationsInsurance Journal · November 18, 2025
- Horizon Organic Milk Recall—& Food Safety Communication Trends, ExplainedForbes · December 28, 2024
- DOJ accuses CVS of fueling the opioid crisis â and charging tax payersNaturalnews.com · December 20, 2024
- CVS reaches settlement with R.I. in vaccine accessibility caseThe Boston Globe · April 11, 2022
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More consumer products settlements
View all →Holsapple v. Reactor Inc. (Vertical Hold) Settlement
Vertical Hold Rock Climbing Gym allegedly excluded male and non-binary customers from paying for women's and ladies' clinics, classes, or events between 2017 and 2020. The defendants agreed to settle this class action lawsuit by providing compensation to eligible class members.
Four day passes to Vertical Hold
Calverton Park Vehicle Towing Settlement
The City of Calverton Park towed vehicles from private property and charged owners fines and fees, including special tax bills, alleging violations of a municipal nuisance ordinance. The defendants deny any wrongdoing or liability.
The amount of your payment will depend on whether you were able to recover your vehicle from the tow lot; the number of days your vehicle was impounded before release; and the total costs of fines and fees, including the Special Tax Bill, you paid to the City of Calverton Park or the tow lot.
Service Spot Settlement - ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org Reservation Fee
Service Spot, LLC and TripGate LLC allegedly failed to properly disclose a mandatory Reservation Fee for online bookings on ParkOn.com and CheapAirportParking.org in violation of California's Honest Pricing Law. The defendants deny they violated any law but agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs.
Pro rata portion of the Settlement Fund based on the total amount of processing fees paid
Gelasio v. Educative Subscription Auto-Renewal Settlement
Educative automatically renewed customers' annual and monthly digital subscription offerings and charged their payment methods without providing the required disclosures and authorizations under California law. Educative denies these claims, and the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further expense and litigation risk.
$11.93–$23.86