EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement
Last verified July 12, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 3, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The EEOC alleges that Kickback Jack's violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by having a policy or practice of intentionally failing to hire male applicants for nonmanagerial front-of-house positions because of their sex from January 2019 through February 2026. Kickback Jack's denies any liability or wrongdoing.
Do you qualify?
Males who were denied a nonmanagerial front-of-house position at Kickback Jack's because of their sex between January 1, 2019 and February 3, 2026.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Monetary relief payment
Eligible male claimants who were denied nonmanagerial front-of-house positions at Kickback Jack's because of their sex may receive a monetary payment from the settlement fund.
Who is in the class
A male and were denied a nonmanagerial front-of-house position at Kickback Jack's because of your sex
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a claim form by August 3, 2026 with your information under oath and penalty of perjury. The EEOC will determine your eligibility and award amount based on the information you provide.
Common questions
- How much does the EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $1.1M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was August 3, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at kbjsettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the EEOC v. Kickback Jack's Employment Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. Payments cannot be issued until the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more