IL AG v United Builders Group Settlement
Owed wages and other compensation, less applicable tax withholdings. Amount varies based on findings of the Attorney General investigation.
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was July 1, 2025. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
The Office of the Attorney General of Illinois brought a lawsuit against United Builders Group Co. and Polo Masonry Builders, alleging that these companies failed to properly pay their workers in accordance with Illinois law, including alleged failure to pay overtime wages. The companies have agreed to settle by paying owed wages and other compensation to affected workers.
Do you qualify?
Anyone who worked for United Builders Group Co. and/or Polo Masonry Builders in Illinois.
How to file
Fill out a Claim Form online at the settlement website or mail a completed Claim Form with the enclosed prepaid envelope. The primary deadline is July 1, 2025 for the first payment after July 31, 2025, or submit a late claim by November 3, 2026.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30