Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Individual Providers (IPs) who provided personal care services to clients claim they were denied full compensation for hours worked because the Washington Department of Social & Health Services applied "shared benefit" rules that reduced their paid care hours. The settlement resolves this lawsuit without the defendants admitting wrongdoing and provides compensation to affected IPs.
Do you qualify?
Individual Providers who provided personal care to clients whose paid care hours were reduced by DSHS because of the "shared benefit" rules between March 7, 2014, and February 28, 2021.
How to file
Settlement payments were automatically mailed to eligible class members who did not opt out. Initial checks were mailed on November 15, 2022, and second round payments were mailed between January 31-February 1, 2024. To verify eligibility and cash a check, you needed to work for an affected client and provide documentation of care hours not paid for.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30