Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement
Last verified September 18, 2026Source: jndHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
DSHS reduced paid care hours for Individual Providers using "shared benefit" rules, allegedly denying them full compensation for hours worked. The settlement resolves the dispute over whether IPs were improperly denied pay and provides $116 million to compensate affected providers.
Do you qualify?
Individual Providers who provided personal care to DSHS clients whose paid care hours were reduced because of DSHS's "shared benefit" rules between March 7, 2014, and February 28, 2021.
Who is in the class
Individual Providers (IPs) who provided personal care to clients whose paid care hours were reduced by DSHS because of the "shared benefit" rules between March 7, 2014, and February 28, 2021.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
The settlement has concluded with payment rounds already distributed (November 2022 and January/February 2024). Eligible class members were automatically mailed checks and needed to cash them to verify their eligibility. The claim period is now closed; no new claims are being accepted.
Common questions
- How much does the Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement pay?
- The total settlement fund is $116M. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- Do I need proof of purchase for the Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement?
- Yes. This settlement asks for documentation supporting your claim — a receipt, an account record, or the notice you were sent. Check the official settlement website for exactly which documents are accepted.
- Is the Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- JND Legal Administration is the settlement administrator for this case. Claims are filed at ipwagesettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Liang v. State of Washington DSHS IP Wage Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for September 16, 2022; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more