Papa John's Employee Settlement
From $5
Last verified July 13, 2026Source: claimdepotHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 16, 2026. You can still see what it was about and follow the case in court below. Looking for money you can still claim? Browse open settlements →
What happened
Papa John's allegedly entered into agreements with franchisees where they agreed not to hire or solicit employees from Papa John's or other franchisees. This allegedly violated the Sherman Antitrust Act and depressed wages and diminished employment opportunities for restaurant-level employees. Defendants deny all wrongdoing and admit no liability.
Do you qualify?
Restaurant-level employees at Papa John's branded restaurants who were affected by the alleged wage suppression and limited employment opportunities caused by the non-hire/non-solicit agreements between Papa John's and its franchisees.
What you can claim
Read from the official settlement notice. Confirm the terms that apply to you on the administrator's site before filing.
Settlement Payment
Class members who submit a claim form and have a claim valued at $5 or more under the allocation formula will receive a settlement payment.
Who is in the class
Plaintiff Ashley Page (the "Named Plaintiff") on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants Papa John's International, Inc. and Papa John's USA, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") violated Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. More specifically, the Named Plaintiff alleges that Defendants entered into agreements with their franchisees pursuant to which franchisees agreed not to hire or solicit employees of Defendants or of other franchisees, which in turn depressed the wages and diminished the employment opportunities of restaurant-level employees at Papa John's branded restaurants.
Quoted from the settlement notice.
How to file
Submit a Claim Form by the March 16, 2026 deadline. Class members will receive a Settlement Payment if their claim under the allocation formula is valued at $5 or more. You can submit your form online through the settlement website.
Common questions
- How much does the Papa John's Employee Settlement pay?
- Estimated payout: From $5. Actual amounts depend on how many valid claims are filed — most settlements divide a fixed fund pro rata, so a higher claim rate means a smaller individual check. An "up to" figure is a cap, not a guarantee.
- What is the claim deadline for the Papa John's Employee Settlement?
- This settlement is closed to new claims — the deadline was March 16, 2026. Once a claim deadline passes you generally forfeit your share, even if you qualified.
- Is the Papa John's Employee Settlement notice real, or a scam?
- Claims are filed at papajohnsemployeesettlement.com. Filing a class action claim is always free — no legitimate settlement charges you to claim, and no administrator will ask for payment, a gift card, or your full Social Security number by email or text. If a notice asks for any of those, it is not from the administrator. When in doubt, ignore the link you were sent and go to the official settlement website directly.
- When will payments from the Papa John's Employee Settlement be sent?
- Class action payouts typically take 12 to 24 months after the claim deadline, and longer if the settlement is appealed. The final approval hearing for this case is set for May 5, 2026; no payments can be issued before a settlement receives final approval.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Ashley Page
- Jamiah Greer
- Jay Houston
Defendants
- Papa John's USA, Inc.
- Papa John's International, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Claire Noelle FordeLowey Dannenberg P.C.
- Roland R. St. Louis , IIILowey Dannenberg P.C.
- Johnathan SeredynskiSilver Golub & Teitell
- Amir AlimehriLowey Dannenberg P.C.
- Yaman SalahiSalahi PC
- Lin Y. ChanLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP- San Francisco
- Jessica A. MoldovanLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP - New York
- Jeremy J. PilaarLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP- San Francisco
- Jalle H. DafaLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP- San Francisco
- Dean M. HarveyLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP- San Francisco
- Connor P. LemireMcCune Wright Arevalo, LLP - Edwardsville
- Anne B. ShaverLieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP- San Francisco
- Rishi RaithathaRadice Law Firm, PC
- Paul V. ShehadiMcEldrew Young
- Natasha Fernandez-SilberRadice Law Firm, PC
- Kenneth A. BohnertConliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan - Louisville
- John RadiceRadice Law Firm, PC
- Eric L. YoungMiller Shah LLP
- Edward L. LasleyConliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan - Louisville
- Daniel E. RubensteinRadice Law Firm, PC
- Bradley Robert PalmerConliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan - Louisville
- April LambertRadice Law Firm, PC
- Vincent BrigantiLowey Dannenberg P.C.
- Christian LevisLowey Dannenberg P.C.
- Walter W. Noss
- Stephanie A. HackettScottScott, Attorneys at Law, LLP - San Diego
- Sean C. RussellScottScott, Attorneys at Law, LLP - San Diego
- Richard D. McCune , Jr.McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP - Ontario
- Michelle E. ConstonScott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP - New York
- Michele M. VercoskiMcCune Wright Arevalo, LLP - Ontario
- Leigh M. PericaMahoney Law Firm, LLC
- Jennifer A. MooreMoore Law Group, PLLC
- Derek Y. BrandtClarkson Law Firm, P.C.
- Ashton R. SmithMoore Law Group, PLLC
Counsel for defendants
- Timothy F. HaleySeyfarth Shaw LLP - Chicago
- Michael L. DeMarinoLaner Muchin, Ltd
- Kristine R. ArgentineSeyfarth Shaw LLP - Chicago
- Jason K. PriebeSeyfarth Shaw LLP - Chicago
- Donald L. Miller , IIQuintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA
- Buddy J. VanCleaveQuintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA
- Ashley K. CanoSeyfarth Shaw LLP - Chicago
- Phillip L. MonhollenQuintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA
- Gerald L. Maatman , Jr.Duane Morris LLP
Parties and counsel from the public court docket. Listing an attorney here isn't an endorsement, and ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with any of them.
In the news
- “He’s a doughtivational speaker”: Papa John’s worker shuts down critic who mocked his jobThe Daily Dot · October 18, 2025
- ‘$7 for that is wild’: Papa Johns worker shares how to make the Oreo bitesThe Daily Dot · October 3, 2023
- Papa John Schnatter Reacts To Attempt By Former Ad Firm To Dismiss Lawsuit, Avoid Accountability After Secret Taping, Set Up, And Alleged Leak To MediaYahoo Entertainment · August 13, 2021
- ‘F*cking Super Right Wing’: Papa John’s Founder Accuses PR Firm Of Leaking Racism Allegations Over Money, Political DisputeThe Daily Caller · March 31, 2021
Headlines via NewsAPI. ClaimWatch isn't affiliated with these publications.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →TBJ Drywall & Taping Wage Settlement
The Illinois Attorney General sued TBJ Drywall & Taping, Inc. for allegedly failing to properly pay workers in accordance with Illinois law, including failure to pay overtime wages. Following an investigation, the parties settled, with TBJ agreeing to pay owed wages and other compensation to eligible workers.
…moreAmount varies by worker; see mailed/emailed notice for individual amount
PacBell Employment Practices Settlement
Pacific Bell Telephone Company allegedly violated California's Kin Care law (Labor Code sections 233 and 234) and Paid Sick-Days law (Labor Code section 246.5) by treating the use of accrued kin-care and paid sick-days as unprotected absences subject to discipline. The company allegedly engaged in unfair business practices and violated the Private Attorneys General Act. Pacific Bell denies all allegations.
…moreA sum of money based on the number of workweeks worked for Defendant from January 1, 2021 to October 23, 2025
AOCLSC INC. Wage and Hour Settlement
Former employees of AOCLSC INC. sued the company for alleged wage and hour violations. The company has agreed to settle by paying back wages to non-exempt hourly employees who worked during the class period and paying penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act.
…more