Rad v. SkinSpirit Essential - Wage and Hour Settlement
What happened
SkinSpirit Essential allegedly violated California wage and hour laws by failing to properly compensate non-exempt employees. The settlement includes both a class settlement for wage claims covering the period October 9, 2020 through March 1, 2026, and a PAGA settlement for penalties covering June 6, 2023 through April 15, 2026.
Do you qualify?
You qualify if you were employed by SkinSpirit Essential in California as a non-exempt employee during the Class Period (October 9, 2020 through March 1, 2026) for the wage settlement, or during the PAGA Period (June 6, 2023 through April 15, 2026) for PAGA penalties. All non-exempt employees automatically qualify unless they opt out.
How to file
You do not need to take any action to participate—you are automatically included as a Class Member and eligible for payment. If you disagree with the number of workweeks or pay periods listed in your notice, you must submit a written challenge by July 27, 2026. If you want to exclude yourself from the wage claim portion (but not PAGA), submit a written Request for Exclusion to the Administrator by July 27, 2026.
New to class actions?
This summary was generated from public settlement documents and may contain errors. Confirm eligibility, deadlines, and payment terms on the official settlement website before filing. ClaimWatch is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Filing a claim is free.
More employment settlements
View all →80/20 ERISA Settlement
The 80/20 Employee Stock Ownership Plan was allegedly administered and terminated by the Defendants in violation of ERISA (the federal law regulating private retirement plans). The lawsuit also involved claims that certain other defendants knowingly participated in these ERISA violations. Defendants deny all claims and admit no fault or liability.
Dallas BBQ ESOP Settlement
This settlement resolves a class action lawsuit concerning the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) sponsored by W BBQ Holdings, Inc., which operates Dallas BBQ restaurants. The defendants have agreed to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
EEOC v. Meathead Movers Age Discrimination Settlement
The EEOC alleged that Meathead Movers, Inc. violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by engaging in age discrimination in hiring and recruitment since at least 2017. The company was accused of discriminating against job applicants based on their age. Meathead Movers agreed to settle these claims through a court-approved Consent Decree on October 14, 2025.
Up to $2 million total to be distributed among eligible class members
Petzing v. The Seven Motor Corporation Employment Application Settlement
The Seven Motor Corporation allegedly failed to disclose the wage scale or salary range in its job postings for open positions in Washington. The defendant disputes the claims and contends it has not violated any law.
Up to $2,172.30