CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 34 cases

Adrian Gucovschi

Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC

Address of record
140 Broadway, 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005, 212-884-4230
Email
adrian@gucovschilaw.com
Phone
(212) 884-4230

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

34
Cases tracked
33 active · 1 settled
$2.7M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 34 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Alvarez v. Conopco, Inc. Fraud Class Action

This proposed class action alleges fraud against Conopco, Inc., a subsidiary of Unilever that manufactures consumer products including personal care and household goods. The lawsuit apparently claims the company engaged in fraudulent practices, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the available docket information. Ordinary consumers who purchased Conopco products could plausibly be class members if the fraud claims relate to misrepresentations about product ingredients, benefits, safety, or labeling.

Filed
September 14, 2026
Represents
Jonathan Gomez Alvarez
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Goli Nutrition Inc. Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Goli Nutrition Inc. engaged in fraud in connection with its nutritional products or marketing practices. The complaint was filed by Alexander Mercado in federal court in the Central District of California under a fraud-based nature of suit code.

Filed
September 1, 2026
Represents
Alexander Mercado
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bloom Nu LLC Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Bloom Nu LLC. Without access to the complaint details, the specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket metadata alone, but the nature of the lawsuit suggests potential consumer product or service-related claims.

Filed
August 26, 2026
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Grant v. Gruns Nutrition Data Breach Class Action

This is a newly filed putative class action against Gruns Nutrition, Inc alleging fraud. Based on the nature of suit code and defendant type, the case apparently concerns allegations of fraudulent conduct, potentially related to product claims, advertising, or consumer transactions, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone.

Filed
August 26, 2026
Represents
Laura Grant
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Magic Spoon Data Breach or Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Magic Spoon, Inc. has been filed alleging fraud. Based on the docket metadata alone, the specific nature of the alleged fraud cannot be determined from the caption or early procedural entries, but the case appears to involve potential consumer harm that could affect ordinary purchasers or users of Magic Spoon's products or services.

Filed
August 19, 2026
Represents
Bianca Mirzaian
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Ulrich v. The LIV Group Fraud Class Action

This proposed class action alleges fraud against The LIV Group, Inc., though specific details about the nature of the fraud are not provided in the available docket information. The complaint was filed in federal court in the Northern District of California. Additional details regarding the claims and potential class members would require access to the full complaint.

Filed
August 12, 2026
Represents
Max Nicholas Ulrich, Sabrina Zahir
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Fitzgerald v. Unilever United States, Inc.

A proposed class action has been filed against Unilever United States, Inc. under a fraud nature of suit. Based on the docket caption alone, the specific allegations cannot be determined, but the case appears to concern potential fraud claims that could affect ordinary consumers of Unilever products.

Filed
July 31, 2026
Represents
Lillian Fitzgerald
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Porcuna v. Chattem Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Chattem, Inc. alleging fraud, filed on behalf of consumer plaintiff Marissa Porcuna. The specific allegations are not detailed in the docket entry, though the nature of suit code (370—Other Fraud) indicates claims of fraudulent conduct. Without access to the full complaint text, the precise nature of the alleged fraud and affected product or service cannot be determined from this filing information alone.

Filed
July 31, 2026
Represents
Marissa Porcuna
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Roman v. Dude Products Data Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Dude Products, LLC alleging fraud, apparently concerning consumer products or services. The case was filed in June 2026 and involves named plaintiffs Rena Roman and Bryan Dawe, though the specific nature of the alleged fraud cannot be determined from the available docket entries.

Filed
June 18, 2026
Represents
Rena Roman, Bryan Dawe
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Beltran v. Ryze, Inc. Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleging fraud by Ryze, Inc. The specific nature of the alleged fraud is not detailed in the available docket information, but the case has been filed in federal district court with a nature of suit classification for fraud matters.

Filed
June 5, 2026
Represents
Steven Beltran
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Costco Wholesale Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Costco Wholesale Corporation alleging fraud. Based solely on the nature of suit code (370 Other Fraud) and the consumer plaintiff name, the case apparently concerns alleged fraudulent conduct by Costco, though specific details regarding the nature of the fraud are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
April 29, 2026
Represents
Sydney Turner
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Greenbach v. Babo Botanicals Inc.

A proposed class action filed against Babo Botanicals Inc. alleging fraud under Nature of Suit code 370. The complaint concerns consumer-related claims, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the docket entries provided, which primarily document procedural matters including stipulations to amend the complaint and case management scheduling.

Filed
April 16, 2026
Represents
Grace Greenbach
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Davis v. Avocado Mattress Class Action

A proposed class action against Avocado Mattress, LLC alleging fraud. Based on the nature of suit code, the complaint apparently concerns fraudulent conduct related to the defendant's mattress products or business practices, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption alone.

Filed
April 7, 2026
Represents
Robyn Davis
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Scott v. Maxim Hair Restoration Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Maxim Hair Restoration, LLC. Based on the limited docket information available, the case appears to involve consumer claims under one or more statutes, though the specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and nature-of-suit code alone. The case was filed in the Southern District of New York in March 2026.

Filed
March 18, 2026
Represents
Jason Scott
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

DoubleDown Interactive Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against DoubleDown Interactive LLC in federal court in Washington. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information, though the case is classified under statutory actions. Based solely on the caption and docket metadata provided, the nature of the consumer claims cannot be determined without access to the complaint itself.

Filed
February 20, 2026
Represents
Lorene Anguiano, Barbara Dobbs, Alicia Burgos, Mary Carlson, Thomas Guillen, Marcel Stokes, Brandon Johnson, Andrew Maguire, Ana Mettali, Samuel Wade
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

AG1 USA Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that AG1 USA, Inc. engaged in fraud in connection with its products or marketing. The case was filed in federal court in the Central District of California under a general fraud nature of suit code, but specific allegations regarding what consumers claim to have been deceived about are not apparent from the available docket information.

Filed
February 3, 2026
Represents
Samuel Hoke
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

SpinX Games Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that SpinX Games, Ltd. committed fraud in connection with its games or gaming services. The complaint was filed in federal court but specific details regarding the nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct are not available from the docket metadata provided.

Filed
February 2, 2026
Represents
Jesse Custer
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Prakash v. Wayfair Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Wayfair LLC alleging fraud, apparently concerning consumer transactions or product-related conduct. The complaint was recently filed in federal court but specific details of the allegations are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
January 30, 2026
Represents
Pooja Prakash
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Realplay Tech Inc. Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Realplay Tech Inc. alleges fraud. Based on the limited information available, the lawsuit concerns alleged fraudulent conduct by the company, though the specific nature and scope of the allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket information provided.

Filed
January 30, 2026
Represents
Jeremy Khinoo
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pitre v. K2 Health Products (Inspire) Fraud Class Action

This proposed class action alleges fraud by K2 Health Products, LLC, operating as Inspire, apparently concerning a health product or service. The specific nature of the alleged fraud is not detailed in the available docket information, but the case suggests consumers may have been deceived regarding the product's benefits, ingredients, claims, or other material aspects.

Filed
January 29, 2026
Represents
Yolanda Pitre
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Fulton v. Edgewell Personal Care Brands Data Breach Class Action

A proposed class action against Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC, apparently concerning allegations of fraud related to a data breach or privacy incident affecting consumers. The case was filed in January 2026 in federal court in Northern California under a fraud-related nature of suit code.

Filed
January 20, 2026
Represents
Sarah Fulton
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Guidotti v. Kradle LLC

A proposed class action filed against Kradle LLC alleging fraud. Without access to the complaint details, the precise nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct cannot be determined from the caption alone, but the nature of suit code indicates this case involves fraud allegations that may affect consumers or account holders.

Filed
December 23, 2025
Represents
Nicole Guidotti
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Diane Varela v. Taste Salud Consumer Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Taste Salud, Inc. engaged in fraud, apparently concerning food or beverage products or services. The complaint was filed in the Central District of California and alleges Other Fraud as the basis for the claims, suggesting potential allegations of misrepresentation or deceptive practices affecting consumers.

Filed
December 22, 2025
Represents
Diane Varela
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Gomez v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Class Action

A proposed class action against Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. alleging fraud. The complaint, recently filed in federal court, apparently concerns consumer-related claims regarding the company's products or practices, though specific details are not available from the docket entry.

Filed
December 9, 2025
Represents
Rebecca Gomez, Francisco Covarrubias
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Gray v. Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action filed against Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. alleging fraud or violations of truth-in-lending laws. The specific claims and allegations are not detailed in the available docket metadata, but the nature of suit suggests the lawsuit concerns allegedly deceptive practices related to consumer product representations or lending terms.

Filed
November 24, 2025
Represents
Gail Gray
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Joyce v. Guthy-Renker Class Action

A proposed class action against Guthy-Renker, LLC alleging fraud. The specific nature of the alleged fraudulent conduct is not detailed in the available docket information, but the case involves a consumer fraud claim against the company.

Filed
November 20, 2025
Represents
Victoria Joyce
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Primal Queen LLC Product Liability Class Action

A proposed class action against Primal Queen, LLC alleging personal injury claims. Based solely on the nature of suit code (360: Other Personal Injury), the complaint apparently concerns consumer product-related injuries, though specific allegations cannot be determined from the caption and docket information provided.

Filed
October 23, 2025
Represents
Allison Blank
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Campbell v. Brand i101 Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action alleging fraud by Brand i101, LLC. Based on the docket caption and nature of suit designation, the complaint apparently concerns consumer fraud allegations, though specific details regarding the nature and scope of the alleged fraudulent conduct are not provided in the available docket information.

Filed
September 17, 2025
Represents
Tawana Campbell
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Observe.AI Consumer Class Action

A proposed class action has been filed against Observe.AI, Inc. The nature of suit is listed as 'P.I.: Other,' suggesting the lawsuit may involve personal injury or other harm to a class of individuals, but the specific allegations are not provided in the docket text. The filing is a new case and no determination of liability has been made.

Filed
June 19, 2025
Represents
Sharrah Thompson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Vital Amine Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action was filed against Vital Amine, Inc. in the Central District of California. The docket classifies the matter as "Other Fraud," but the available entries do not describe the specific allegations. The filings are allegations only, not proven facts, and the docket shows a later voluntary dismissal with prejudice.

Filed
June 9, 2025
Represents
Camilla Blackett
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Dialpad Class Action

This was a proposed class action against Dialpad, Inc. The docket text does not detail the specific factual allegations, but the nature of suit is 'P.I.: Other,' suggesting personal injury or other tort claims; these allegations are unproven. Dialpad moved to compel individual arbitration and to dismiss the complaint, and the plaintiff subsequently voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice.

Filed
May 28, 2025
Represents
William Terrill
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Prager University Foundation Video Privacy Class Action

A proposed class action against Prager University Foundation, apparently concerning claims under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The docket text shows a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement, but does not detail the alleged conduct. The allegations are not proven and no settlement has been finally approved.

Filed
May 5, 2025
Represents
Sylvia Chandra, Damany Browne
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Limited Run Games Video Privacy Settlement

Limited Run Games Inc. allegedly disclosed subscribers' personally identifiable information to Meta Platforms and other third parties without consent, violating the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). The defendant denies wrongdoing and the court has not decided the case on its merits.

Settlement fund
$2.7M
Claim deadline
January 20, 2026
Represents
John Carbone
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Pixi, Inc. Fraud Class Action

A proposed class action against Pixi, Inc. was filed in the Eastern District of New York. Based on the docket, the case is classified as a fraud or truth-in-lending matter, suggesting it may involve alleged deceptive practices affecting consumers. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available metadata.

Filed
August 12, 2024
Represents
Brian Kelly

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.