Pixi, Inc. Fraud Class Action
Last verified October 9, 2026Source: courtlistener-litigationHow ClaimWatch verifies cases
Still being litigated: the claims below are allegations, not findings, and there is no settlement, claim form or payout yet.
Where this case stands
In litigation
The case has been filed and is being fought in court. There is no settlement, no claim form and no payout yet; many class actions are dismissed or never certified.
Pending in the District Court, E.D. New York (No. 1:24-cv-05635).
- August 12, 2024Case filed
What happened
A proposed class action against Pixi, Inc. was filed in the Eastern District of New York. Based on the docket, the case is classified as a fraud or truth-in-lending matter, suggesting it may involve alleged deceptive practices affecting consumers. The specific allegations are not detailed in the available metadata.
Do you qualify?
No settlement exists yet, so there is nothing to file and no class definition to check. If the case settles, the settlement will define exactly who qualifies — watch this case and we'll let you know.
How to file
There is no claim to file yet. If this case reaches a settlement, a claim process will open — usually with an official settlement website and a filing deadline.
Common questions
- Can I file a claim in the Pixi, Inc. Fraud Class Action case?
- No. The case is still being litigated — there is no settlement, no claim form, and no payout. It was filed August 12, 2024 in the District Court, E.D. New York (No. 1:24-cv-05635).What a class action lawsuit is →
- Who are the attorneys in the Pixi, Inc. Fraud Class Action?
- For the plaintiffs: Adrian Gucovschi (Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC). For Pixi, Inc.: Jonathan Daniel Lupkin (Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP). From the public court docket.
Who's involved
Plaintiffs
- Brian Kelly
Defendants
- Pixi, Inc.
Counsel for plaintiffs
- Adrian GucovschiGucovschi Law Firm, PLLCRepresents Brian Kelly34 tracked cases · $2.7M in disclosed settlementsadrian@gucovschilaw.com · (212) 884-4230
Counsel for defendants
- Jonathan Daniel LupkinRottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLPRepresents Pixi, Inc.jlupkin@rfbllp.com · (646) 367-2772
Other cases these firms appear in
- Alvarez v. Conopco, Inc. Fraud Class Action · Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC
- Goli Nutrition Inc. Consumer Fraud Class Action · Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC
- Bloom Nu LLC Consumer Class Action · Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC
- Grant v. Gruns Nutrition Data Breach Class Action · Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC
From the public court docket, contact details as filed; not an endorsement.
Guides:What is a class action lawsuit?How class membership worksYour options as a class member
Summarised from public settlement documents; confirm terms on the official settlement website. ClaimWatch is not a law firm, and filing a claim is free.
More finance settlements
View all →Brimmer v. City of Overland Special Deterrent Fees Settlement
Up to $80
Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement
Settlement Fund will be distributed proportionally (pro rata) to each valid claimant after deductions for attorneys' fees (up to 30%), litigation costs, notice and administration costs, and service awards (up to $17,500 per class representative)
Visa and Mastercard ATM Access Fees Class Action Settlement
Each eligible claimant will receive a share of the net settlement fund based on the number of eligible surcharged transactions they submit.