CClaimWatch
Plaintiff counsel in 17 cases

Anthony Ilo Paronich

Paronich Law PC

Address of record
350 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Hingham, MA 02043, 617-485-0018
Email
anthony@paronichlaw.com
Phone
(617) 485-0018
Fax
Fax 508-318-8100

Contact details as filed with the court in the cases below.

17
Cases tracked
16 active · 1 settled
$9.9M
Plaintiff-side recovery
Disclosed settlement funds
—
Defense-side exposure
Resolved in settlements
1
Cases with values
of 17 tracked

Case history

Publicly tracked matters where this attorney is listed as counsel.

Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Fast Response Heating & Cooling TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleges that Fast Response Heating & Cooling LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unwanted calls or text messages to consumers. The case was filed in federal court in Texas and seeks relief on behalf of affected consumers.

Filed
June 4, 2026
Represents
Catherine Spoon
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Bronstin v. Ixonia Bank TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Ixonia Bank under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), apparently concerning unwanted telemarketing calls or text messages. The case is in early stages with the defendant filing a motion to dismiss that is currently being briefed by both parties.

Filed
May 30, 2026
Represents
Asher Bronstin
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Hoffman v. DB Miami Inc. TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) against DB Miami Inc. (doing business as True Gold Republic). The complaint appears to involve allegedly improper telephone communications, though specific details of the alleged conduct are not provided in the available docket entries. The case is in early stages with discovery deadlines recently established by the court.

Filed
May 29, 2026
Represents
Mark Hoffman
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Slydes Carwash TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Slydes Carwash LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), apparently through unwanted telephone communications such as calls, texts, or faxes sent to consumers without proper consent or in violation of do-not-call regulations. The case was filed in February 2026 and seeks to represent a class of affected consumers who received such communications from the defendant.

Filed
February 25, 2026
Represents
Joshua Wilson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Wilson v. Wash Masters TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Wash Masters, L.P. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which restricts telemarketing calls, automated calls, text messages, and prerecorded calls to consumers. The case was filed on behalf of consumers who allegedly received unlawful calls or messages from the defendant.

Filed
February 25, 2026
Represents
Joshua Wilson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Papa Murphy's TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against Papa Murphy's Company Stores Inc alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case apparently concerns Papa Murphy's alleged misuse of telephone or text communications in violation of TCPA requirements and restrictions on consumer contacts.

Filed
February 23, 2026
Represents
Nathen Barton
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Spoon v. Core Ortho Innovations Inc (TCPA)

A proposed class action filed under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Core Ortho Innovations Inc. The case appears to concern alleged violations related to telephone communications or contact practices subject to TCPA enforcement.

Filed
February 23, 2026
Represents
Catherine Spoon
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Spoon v. The Law Base Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that The Law Base Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case appears to concern alleged unlawful telephone calls or communications, though specific details about the nature and scope of the alleged violations are not available from the docket information provided.

Filed
February 20, 2026
Represents
Catherine Spoon
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

McGonigle v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, apparently alleging unlawful telephone communications or calls made to consumers without proper consent or in violation of TCPA restrictions. The case was filed in February 2026 and is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

Filed
February 13, 2026
Represents
Andrew James McGonigle
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Rojas v. Pillar Private Lending TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleging that Pillar Private Lending LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), apparently through unauthorized or improper telephone communications. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on January 23, 2026.

Filed
January 23, 2026
Represents
Jorge Rojas
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action alleging that Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit apparently concerns unauthorized or improper telephone communications, which could include unwanted calls, texts, or other telephonic contact in violation of TCPA restrictions.

Filed
January 7, 2026
Represents
Chet Michael Wilson
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Roy v. Hayes Family Enterprises Telephone Consumer Protection Act Class Action

This is a proposed class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint apparently concerns alleged improper telephone calls or text messages. The specific nature of the alleged TCPA violations will depend on details in the complaint, which are not available from the docket entry provided.

Filed
November 26, 2025
Represents
Tony Roy
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

AT&T Services TCPA Class Action

A proposed class action against AT&T Services Inc under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), apparently concerning alleged violations related to telephone communications or calling practices. The case was filed in October 2025 in the Northern District of Texas.

Filed
October 20, 2025
Represents
Allen Hartoonian
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Hoffman v. BCI Acrylic TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that BCI Acrylic LLC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which regulates unsolicited calls, texts, and faxes to consumers. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of consumers who apparently received unwanted calls or messages from the defendant.

Filed
October 15, 2025
Represents
Mark Hoffman
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Verizon Wireless TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Verizon Wireless Services violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The case appears to involve claims arising from telecommunications practices, though the specific allegations are not detailed in the available docket information.

Filed
September 22, 2025
Represents
Peter Duffy
Plaintiff counselActive litigation — no settlement yet

Williams v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation TCPA Class Action

This proposed class action alleges that Freedom Mortgage Corporation violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unauthorized telemarketing calls or text messages to consumers. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of affected consumers who allegedly received these calls or messages in violation of federal telecom regulations.

Filed
September 17, 2025
Represents
Brittany Williams
Plaintiff counselSettled — claims closed

Jackson v. Gen Digital Inc. - Robocall Settlement

Gen Digital Inc. made artificial or prerecorded voice calls to consumers' cellular telephones regarding LifeLock or Norton accounts when the recipients did not have such accounts, in violation of telemarketing laws.

Settlement fund
$9.9M
Claim deadline
April 13, 2026
Represents
Michelle Jackson

“Recovery” and “exposure” refer to total disclosed settlement funds in associated cases, not money personally won or lost by an attorney. Settlements generally resolve disputed allegations without a finding that either side won. Data comes from public court dockets and may be incomplete.